Conversation
Notices
-
To be clear: I don't like one company-controlled FS, and even less dual licensing. In many cases it just stifles development!
-
♻ @carlopiana: I don't like one company-controlled FS & even less dual [proprietary] [re]licensing. In many cases it stifles development!
about 4 months ago from web-
@bkuhn @carlopiana Corporate driven FS: not assigning copyright to them forces them to be honest.
about 4 months ago from web-
@liw: it depends. The ant cannot drive the elephant, so we should aim more at a different corporate mindset. We'll get there any soon. :-)
-
All this talk re: "Open Core" & single-entity-controlled #GPL software led me to blog: "Open Core" is the new Shareware: http://ur1.ca/dt7t
about 4 months ago from web-
"Open Core" is the new Shareware: http://ur1.ca/dt7t << Maybe the new Open Source, a self-defeating attempt to ignore freedom for profit?
-
@bkuhn here is my Open Core Model Is Bogus
about 4 months ago from web -
@bkuhn http://zotzbro.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2009-08-24T07%3A36%3A00-04%3A00&max-results=7 - oops
about 4 months ago from web -
@bkuhn The term open-core arrived with a very specific definition http://bit.ly/1D9vZ9, later updated http://bit.ly/3aYWbB
about 4 months ago from web-
@caostheory, those open core defns seem more convoluted than one I used, but basically same. Also, they use confusing term "dual licensing".
about 4 months ago from web
-
-
@bkuhn great post! we used to use "shareware" to describe the model before lampitt coined "open-core".
about 4 months ago from twitterrific
-
-
-
-
-