Identi.ca Identi.ca
  • Login
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular

Conversation

Notices

  1. Graham Perrin Graham Perrin StatusNet , OpenMicroBlogging , Identi.ca

    !OpenMicroBlogging !StatusNet !Identica good discussion of #Community #Equity and #karma at http://ur1.ca/h8fb #microblogging #spam #points

    Sunday, 06-Dec-09 20:01:20 UTC from web
    • Mackenzie Mackenzie Ubuntu DC LoCo Group , Ted Smith

      @teddks can i be an admin on !ubuntudc ? There are a bunch of spammers I'd like to remove...

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 04:19:22 UTC
    • Ron K. Jeffries Ron K. Jeffries spamreport , Mackenzie

      @maco I don't think group admins have the power (yet) to ban the damn spammers. !spamreport

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 04:40:11 UTC
    • Octav Sandulescu Octav Sandulescu Ron K. Jeffries

      @rkj Naw, group admins can block spammers from a group just fine.

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 04:40:58 UTC
    • Ron K. Jeffries Ron K. Jeffries Octav Sandulescu

      @narc @sobotka this i scurrently limited to a group, right? If admin of a group finds a spammer, they can only ban from that group only??

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 04:45:55 UTC
    • Octav Sandulescu Octav Sandulescu Ron K. Jeffries

      @rkj Pretty much. Would be interesting to see it expanded further, though -- leverage the power of many group admins?

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 04:47:03 UTC
    • Mackenzie Mackenzie LinuxChix , Ron K. Jeffries

      @rkj um, yes we do. i just banned ~100 spammers from !linuxchix

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 04:47:06 UTC
    • Ron K. Jeffries Ron K. Jeffries spamreport , Octav Sandulescu

      @narc !spamreport when group admin identifies a spammer, should be able to at a minimum suspend identica privleges pending a second opinion

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 04:49:02 UTC
    • Ron K. Jeffries Ron K. Jeffries Mackenzie

      @maco but same spammers can still wreak havoc elsewhere in identica, no?

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 04:50:19 UTC
    • Octav Sandulescu Octav Sandulescu Ron K. Jeffries

      @rkj Disagree, single group admin shouldn't have that power. More than one, though, and we can start thinking about that.

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 04:50:25 UTC
    • Ron K. Jeffries Ron K. Jeffries spamreport , Octav Sandulescu

      @narc !spamreport when group admin identifies a spammer, should be able to at a minimum suspend identica privleges pending a second opinion

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 04:50:31 UTC
    • Mackenzie Mackenzie Ron K. Jeffries

      @rkj yes

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 04:50:56 UTC
    • Octav Sandulescu Octav Sandulescu Ron K. Jeffries

      @rkj For instance, if a user's been banned from 10+ groups, that could be an auto-permaban. Never just with one group.

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 04:51:23 UTC
    • Octav Sandulescu Octav Sandulescu Ron K. Jeffries

      @rkj Example: bad person takes over a group (by confidence scam, maybe) and bans everyone in it. Everyone has to wait for second opinion?

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 04:54:49 UTC
    • Ron K. Jeffries Ron K. Jeffries Octav Sandulescu

      @narc understand your concern, but would argue 2 group bans should temporarily suspend a user. if review shows they are OK, then re-enable

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 04:55:40 UTC
    • Octav Sandulescu Octav Sandulescu Octav Sandulescu

      @narc This argument particularly tries to highlight the fact that CPU time is effectively infinite, human attention is not.

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 04:55:48 UTC
    • Octav Sandulescu Octav Sandulescu Ron K. Jeffries

      @rkj Sure, at that point it's just a question of how long to ban them for, increasing length with increasing number of bans.

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 04:56:32 UTC
    • Marjolein Katsma Marjolein Katsma Ron K. Jeffries

      @rkj don't agree: group admins can ban, but should report as well; don't forget that spammers report spammers and create groups themselves!

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 08:40:07 UTC
    • Marjolein Katsma Marjolein Katsma Ron K. Jeffries

      @rkj so merely being a group admin somewhere should not impart any kind of karma or power, spammers can and will game everything

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 08:41:30 UTC
    • peanut peanut Ron K. Jeffries

      @rkj group-admins can block spammers from their group... that should be sufficient...

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 09:30:11 UTC
    • Ted Smith Ted Smith Mackenzie

      @maco sure, I'll add you when I get to a computer.

      Wednesday, 02-Dec-09 13:51:42 UTC
    • Ron K. Jeffries Ron K. Jeffries spamreport

      @grahamperrin thanks for pointing me to that discussion of karma. what is current status in statusnet/identica? !spamreport

      Sunday, 06-Dec-09 20:03:45 UTC

Site notice

  • API
  • Status

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Identi.ca is a microblogging service brought to you by Status.net. It runs the StatusNet microblogging software, version 1.1.0-alpha1, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Identi.ca content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to mobile site layout.

Built in Montreal