Identi.ca Identi.ca
  • Login
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular

Conversation

Notices

  1. byteday.org byteday.org GNU's Not Unix , Linux

    SourceForge closed for five countries - is !FOSS still free and open? http://is.gd/76Hhk !gnu !freesoftware !linux #linux

    Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 21:37:12 UTC from Gwibber
    • László Torma likes this.
    • Wojciech Ryrych Wojciech Ryrych Linux

      @byteday the mentioned countries are communists countries so who cares about them? !linux

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 21:45:49 UTC
    • Ted Smith Ted Smith Ubuntu users , GNU's Not Unix , Linux , Wojciech Ryrych

      @rrh Software freedom is for all humans, not just capitalists. !linux !gnu !ubuntu

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 21:47:10 UTC
    • Samuel Brack Samuel Brack Wojciech Ryrych

      @rrh Iran, Syria etc are communist? This is new to me!

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 21:51:10 UTC
    • Wojciech Ryrych Wojciech Ryrych Samuel Brack

      @samuelbrack I meant China, North Korea and Cuba ;)

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 21:52:29 UTC
    • Aurélio A. Heckert Aurélio A. Heckert Linux , WTF? , Wojciech Ryrych

      @rrh !WTF??? You don't like the government, so fuck up the people? That was incredible idiot! !linux #hate

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 21:52:30 UTC
      Ted Smith likes this.
    • 0u 0u Ted Smith

      @teddks capitalism of course isn't the problem. (although capitalism without things to balance its impact is pretty terrible.)

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 21:52:59 UTC
    • Ben Boeckel Ben Boeckel

      @byteday been hearing about this; who's doing the blocking?

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 21:54:58 UTC
    • Samuel Brack Samuel Brack Wojciech Ryrych

      @rrh okay, but why shouldn't communists have access o FOSS?

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 21:55:32 UTC
    • Wojciech Ryrych Wojciech Ryrych Linux , Samuel Brack

      @samuelbrack I did NOT tell the people shouldn't but meant communism was and IS the greatest danger in 20th/21st century !linux

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:00:08 UTC
    • Stéphane Marguet Stéphane Marguet Wojciech Ryrych

      @rrh : yeah, I'm also pretty sure two tiny countries are the greatest danger for the 21st century /s

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:03:47 UTC
    • Ted Smith Ted Smith 0u

      @openuniverse ...so capitalism isn't the problem... except that it is?

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:06:50 UTC
    • yareckon yareckon Wojciech Ryrych

      @rrh okay.... um..lol.

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:07:58 UTC
    • 0u 0u Ted Smith

      @teddks too much of anything is not great. i think some capitalism is beneficial. some things are more important,capitalism can't come first

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:11:23 UTC
    • Ted Smith Ted Smith 0u

      @openuniverse that's both over-simplistic and logically inconsistent, but I can't argue in <140chars

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:12:04 UTC
    • 0u 0u Ted Smith

      @teddks most things in 140 limit are simplistic :P but hint me, what's inconsistent about it?

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:14:06 UTC
    • Ted Smith Ted Smith 0u

      @openuniverse You can't subscribe to capitalism and hold anything above it.

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:16:25 UTC
    • 0u 0u Ted Smith

      @teddks lol, ok so we define capitalism a little differently then. if one cannot hold anything above it, everything else you said is true.

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:18:19 UTC
    • Ted Smith Ted Smith 0u

      @openuniverse If you value something higher than capitalism and act on that, you interfere with the free market, thus being a bad capitalist

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:22:38 UTC
    • 0u 0u Ted Smith

      @teddks imo, this is like the confusion between extremism and religion. neither inherently requires the other.

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:23:41 UTC
    • 0u 0u Ted Smith

      @teddks somehow i think we can have some capitalist ideals without being black and white about the free market

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:27:17 UTC
    • Ted Smith Ted Smith 0u

      @openuniverse That isn't capitalism. Also, what are "capitalist ideals"?

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:28:16 UTC
    • 0u 0u Ted Smith

      @teddks prvt 'ownership of the means of production, creation of goods or services for profit in a market, prices and wages?' enWP/capitalism

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:38:37 UTC
    • 0u 0u Ted Smith

      @teddks the wp article on it (which to be fair, i madeup) doesnt support the idea that capitalism must come first to be capitalism. justsoyk

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:40:52 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva 0u

      @openuniverse disagree as much as you like. I'm going by the definition published by the group that coined the term

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:42:41 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva 0u

      @openuniverse now, do you seriously want to defend the position that a piece of binary-only software is open source?

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:43:52 UTC
    • 0u 0u Alexandre Oliva

      @lxoliva ha, NO. fortunately that is THEIR burden. i'm a FREE SOFTWARE advocate. THEY might say:"on the whole, it's open source."

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:48:12 UTC
    • 0u 0u Alexandre Oliva

      @lxoliva the perens def? because everyone has their own version now. while his is ok, in practice "oss" points to the bad definitions too

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:51:58 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva 0u

      @openuniverse IIRC the OSI def, OSD, is (very) slightly modified from Peren's Free Software definition

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:54:30 UTC
    • 0u 0u Wojciech Ryrych

      @rrh if "communists" took over your country, shouldn't YOU still be entitled to software freedom?

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:56:16 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva 0u

      @openuniverse the diffs make room for such stuff as software under RPL being OSS but not FS, and GNU autoconf being FS but not OSS

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:56:55 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva 0u

      @openuniverse but not for current versions of Linux being FS or OSS

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:57:18 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva 0u

      @openuniverse but the main diffs are not in the software, but rather in the attitude, the mindset

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:58:35 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva 0u

      @openuniverse per the FS philosophy, software that is not Free is unethical, even if it is borderline non-Free (say RPL)

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:59:19 UTC
      Frederico Goncalves Guimaraes likes this.
    • 0u 0u Alexandre Oliva

      @lxoliva and we're quibbling anyway. though we'd get much farther quibbling over a definition that isn't co-opted daily.

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:59:23 UTC
    • Arne Babenhauserheide Arne Babenhauserheide Wojciech Ryrych

      @rrh what's communism to you?

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 22:59:39 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva 0u

      @openuniverse per the OSS mindset, software that is not OSS is ok, it just tends to be technically inferior and less economical

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 23:00:49 UTC
      Frederico Goncalves Guimaraes likes this.
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva 0u

      @openuniverse it's not like Free Software isn't under attack too... Free vs commercial is very common, though nonsensical if you get it

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 23:02:29 UTC
    • 0u 0u Alexandre Oliva

      @lxoliva and from there is just goes downhill. i believed very strongly for a long time that oss mindset was better. http://ur1.ca/kqjl

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 23:06:06 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva 0u

      @openuniverse I gather you don't any more. if so, awesome. time to s/openuniverse/freeuniverse/, then? ;-D

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 23:10:06 UTC
    • 0u 0u Alexandre Oliva

      @lxoliva money + mindset that non-free is 'ok' is a lousy pairing for integrity. if money's involved free software's easier to keep ethical.

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 23:12:43 UTC
    • 0u 0u Alexandre Oliva

      @lxoliva 'open' is moretolerable for referringto free culture than for sw. i speak of free/open culture, for sw the difference is more vital

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 23:17:08 UTC
    • Wojciech Ryrych Wojciech Ryrych 0u

      @openuniverse I didn't mean normal people shouldn't be entitled but we must respect sourceforge right

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 23:17:25 UTC
    • 0u 0u Wojciech Ryrych

      @rrh youmake me wonder this: #gpl if you'renot distributing binaries to countries{xyz}do youHAVE TO distribute source to{xyz}- i suspect not

      Tuesday, 26-Jan-10 23:26:49 UTC
    • Robin Green Robin Green Wojciech Ryrych

      @rrh I actually agree, but probably not for the same reasons. China's the biggest impediment to a global deal on #1 threat: global warming.

      Wednesday, 27-Jan-10 08:49:38 UTC
    • Arne Babenhauserheide Arne Babenhauserheide Open Source , 0u

      @openuniverse With !gpl you only have to give the source to people who get the binary from you.

      Wednesday, 27-Jan-10 15:52:05 UTC
    • 0u 0u Arne Babenhauserheide

      @arnebab as i thought, the real wondering is about how it applies to sf and other countries. granted my preference is universal access.

      Thursday, 28-Jan-10 00:19:44 UTC
    • Arne Babenhauserheide Arne Babenhauserheide 0u

      @openuniverse iirc when someone somehow gets a copy of the program, he's eligible for the source obtained the same way.

      Thursday, 28-Jan-10 06:15:14 UTC

Site notice

  • API
  • Status

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Identi.ca is a microblogging service brought to you by Status.net. It runs the StatusNet microblogging software, version 1.1.0-alpha1, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Identi.ca content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to mobile site layout.

Built in Montreal