Identi.ca Identi.ca
  • Login
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular

Conversation

Notices

  1. Michael C. Harris Michael C. Harris

    I like #limit140 characters, because I can read them at a glance as they come in. More than that becomes a distraction, have to shift focus.

    Monday, 08-Feb-10 06:54:50 UTC from web at Northcote, Victoria, Australia
    • Michael C. Harris Michael C. Harris

      And I can still express a complete thought in #limit140. Or is it just that my thoughts are short or ill-formed?

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 07:02:29 UTC
    • Ed Fonseca Ed Fonseca Hippy Steve

      @michaeltwofish well, if you listen @exador23, it's because you can't form good thoughts with just 140. Otherwise, abbrvt?

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 07:07:30 UTC
    • Hippy Steve Hippy Steve Ed Fonseca

      @edythemighty @michaeltwofish no. it is quite easy to form a simple thought in #140. But it can take more to explain that http://ur1.ca/lrw2

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 07:15:01 UTC
    • Andy C Andy C

      @michaeltwofish No - your thoughts are well formed, succinct and to the point.

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 07:18:21 UTC
    • Michael C. Harris Michael C. Harris Hippy Steve

      @exador23 There you go, a simple thought, with a link to something longer, something I had to _read_ not just glance at.

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 07:48:25 UTC
    • Hippy Steve Hippy Steve

      @michaeltwofish but without it you would have sat there wondering if i'd just accused you of being a simpleton. happens often in 140.

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 07:54:15 UTC
    • Michael C. Harris Michael C. Harris Hippy Steve

      @exador23 Can't say I've felt that often with 140 character limit. Either I'm thick skinned or I don't converse with you enough.

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 07:58:23 UTC
    • Hippy Steve Hippy Steve

      @michaeltwofish I always ask if I'm unsure. but i've watched a number of heated arguments based on similar misunderstandings.

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 07:59:46 UTC
    • Michael C. Harris Michael C. Harris Hippy Steve

      @exador23 Either way, if posts become significantly longer, µblogging would lose its appeal for me, and I'd probably just leave. /me shrugs

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 08:00:10 UTC
    • Michael C. Harris Michael C. Harris Hippy Steve

      @exador23 Heated arguments will happen no matter what the forum. We're not perfect at translating thoughts to words or words to thoughts.

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 08:01:41 UTC
    • Hippy Steve Hippy Steve

      @michaeltwofish here's what microblogging at 300 looks like brainbird.net if that's too much to handle, well, I don't know what else to say.

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 08:03:57 UTC
    • Hippy Steve Hippy Steve

      ...and that's with about 15% less horizontal width before line-wrapping versus identica.

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 08:06:28 UTC
    • Andy C Andy C Hippy Steve

      @exador23 It's about choice and opinions. No one's necessarily right or wrong. And yes - my brain can just about cope with BrainBird :-)

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 08:07:37 UTC
    • Remote profile options...
      HippySteve HippySteve Andy C

      @andyc sure. I'd be cool with a global pref that truncates at 140 with a ↓ to expand any post you wanted more of, but t http://ur1.ca/ls26

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 08:13:58 UTC
    • Fabian Scherschel Fabian Scherschel Hippy Steve , Andy C

      @michaeltwofish @andyc @exador23 Any limit is arbitrary, so I say stick with 140. If you want more, use BrainBird. #limit140

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 08:27:10 UTC
      Andy C likes this.
    • Hippy Steve Hippy Steve Fabian Scherschel , Andy C

      @fabsh @michaeltwofish @andyc I've already said all i needed to here http://ur1.ca/lsal there's nothing I can add in 140.

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 08:36:18 UTC
    • Fabian Scherschel Fabian Scherschel Hippy Steve

      @exador23 See. For anything that doesn't fit 140, there's blogging. That's why this is called MICROblogging. #limit140

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 08:38:09 UTC
    • Hippy Steve Hippy Steve Fabian Scherschel

      @fabsh http://www.thefreedictionary.com/micro

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 08:41:35 UTC
    • frankenspock frankenspock Fabian Scherschel

      @fabsh Yes, I see where "micro" is always defined as "140." Very mysterious. I wonder how Twitter stumbled on the perfect number?

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 08:44:03 UTC
    • frankenspock frankenspock Fabian Scherschel

      @fabsh BTW, God made Adam and EVE, not Adam and GREATER THAN ONE HUNDRED FORTY CHARACTERS.

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 08:44:58 UTC
    • Ryan Finnie Ryan Finnie frankenspock

      @frankenspock The original rationale was "username: + 140 characters of text" fit in a 160-character SMS.

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 08:51:16 UTC
    • frankenspock frankenspock Ryan Finnie

      @fo0bar I'm aware of that. Please stay off the failed sarcasm.

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 08:52:56 UTC
    • Michael C. Harris Michael C. Harris Hippy Steve

      @exador23 What I want from µblogging is glanceability. Brainbird confirms to me that 300 isn't glanceable for me.

      Monday, 08-Feb-10 08:58:39 UTC
      Andy C likes this.

Site notice

  • API
  • Status

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Identi.ca is a microblogging service brought to you by Status.net. It runs the StatusNet microblogging software, version 1.1.0-alpha1, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Identi.ca content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to mobile site layout.

Built in Montreal