Identi.ca Identi.ca
  • Login
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular

Conversation

Notices

  1. Remote profile options...
    HippySteve HippySteve Stav Prodromou

    @stav@identi.ca i would posit the problem is with the patent process itself. what was intended to spur … http://identi.ca/attachment/9934397

    Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 22:14:58 UTC from brainbird.net at Los Angeles, California, United States
    • Stav Prodromou Stav Prodromou

      @exador23 I have yet to hear a good alternative from anti-patent gang how to protect inventors so they can get rewarded for their efforts.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 22:25:21 UTC
    • 0u 0u Stav Prodromou

      @stav no patents are a fine alternative. apple didn't invent ANY of those things. their patents are like a spanish flag on american soil.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 22:27:41 UTC
    • Stav Prodromou Stav Prodromou

      @exador23 I would favor laws to prevent corporations from commandeering their employees' patents. Only get right to nonexclusive license.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 22:29:19 UTC
    • 0u 0u Stav Prodromou

      @stav anytime you introduce legislation where everyone is guilty, it's probably stupid laws. that's where we are, everyone infringes swpats

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 22:32:43 UTC
    • Stav Prodromou Stav Prodromou 0u

      @openuniverse And "everyone" downloads copyrighted music and movies. Are you OK with that?

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 22:35:06 UTC
    • Xidram Xidram Stav Prodromou

      @stav What protects innovations on patented inventions? Reward comes from supplying demand. Monopoly over an innovation is not progressive.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 22:35:12 UTC
    • 0u 0u Stav Prodromou

      @stav ABSOLUTELY. and you'd be crazy not to be.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 22:35:43 UTC
    • Stav Prodromou Stav Prodromou Xidram

      @xidram For many inventions (agree not all) it is impossible for inventor to compete against low-cost manufacturers who simply copy.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 22:40:01 UTC
    • jake todd jake todd Stav Prodromou

      @stav that's a red herring. I'm talking about pure Laissez-faire capitalism

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 22:40:13 UTC
    • Xidram Xidram Stav Prodromou

      @stav So what? If the competitor offers the same quality at lower cost, then the inventor should invest in innovation or marketing.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 22:41:49 UTC
    • 0u 0u Stav Prodromou

      @stav imagine if bell labs and texas instruments has been blocked from semiconductor innovation by british researchers

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 22:42:55 UTC
    • Stav Prodromou Stav Prodromou 0u

      @openuniverse Not sure which British researchers. Original Bell Labs patents had most claims rejected b/c Lilienfeld's transistor patent.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 22:52:30 UTC
    • 0u 0u Stav Prodromou

      @stav bell labs deserved credit for their innovations, more than edison i would guess. and a lot of 'innovation' is parallel not linear

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 22:54:06 UTC
    • Gregg H Gregg H 0u

      @openuniverse Reading Unjust Deserts. "Simultaneous invention", knowledge in a field reaches a point where next step is obvious & inevitable

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:10:46 UTC
    • Stav Prodromou Stav Prodromou jake todd , Xidram , 0u

      @xidram @dread @openuniverse Sorry. Too many threads to follow/debate. I'll stick to position that patents are needed to protect inventors.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:11:37 UTC
    • 0u 0u Gregg H

      @greggish convergent evolution, in design form

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:11:52 UTC
    • 0u 0u Stav Prodromou

      @stav oh yes, protect them from staying relevant.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:12:27 UTC
    • jake todd jake todd Stav Prodromou

      @stav *rolls eyes*

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:12:38 UTC
    • Xidram Xidram Stav Prodromou

      @stav That's fine. Believe whatever. Just don't be surprised when people disagree with you and try to clear your faith with reason. :-)

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:18:58 UTC
    • jake todd jake todd Xidram

      @xidram The better choice is A, b/c it's new, has better h/w and software. But, it costs $1000, when my budget is $500. B costs $500.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:20:06 UTC
    • jake todd jake todd Xidram

      @xidram But, it costs $1000, when my budget is $500. B costs $500. The right (econ. sound) choice is B.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:20:19 UTC
    • Xidram Xidram jake todd

      @dread Then A would be a better product in your eyes, but B would be the better choice. The choice is the selection; not the object.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:23:29 UTC
    • Xidram Xidram jake todd

      @dread And on that note, all that matters is the selection; not the object. Suppliers don't make money off objects, but off sales.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:24:41 UTC
    • jake todd jake todd Xidram

      @xidram I think we're arguing about different things

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:25:02 UTC
    • Stav Prodromou Stav Prodromou Xidram

      @xidram Thanks for attempting to shed light into deep deep dark recesses between my ears. Your cause, unfortunately, is utterly hopeless :-)

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:25:19 UTC
    • Xidram Xidram jake todd

      @dread I'm just saying that people may reasonably choose cheaper Chinese products because price is a major factor alongside quality.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:26:25 UTC
    • Xidram Xidram Stav Prodromou

      @stav Yeah, I don't mind beliefs until govt. is lobbied to point the gun at me. I don't mind being an outcast as long as I can live my life.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:33:31 UTC
    • jake todd jake todd Xidram

      @xidram I would agree with that. But I was originally talking about buying long-term, high quality goods.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:34:06 UTC
    • jake todd jake todd Xidram

      @xidram other things equal, a higher quality & priced long term good is a better choice than an inferior long term good

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:35:03 UTC
    • Xidram Xidram jake todd

      @dread Intended term of use just another factor in consumer decision. All I'm saying is that these things are far more complex than binary.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:35:55 UTC
    • Xidram Xidram jake todd

      @dread This is not always true. Quality: A = B * 2; B = C * 2; Price: A = B * 5; B = C * 2. The most cost effective buy would be B there.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:38:36 UTC
    • jake todd jake todd Xidram

      @xidram which is just another reason to simplify the process by making it objective http://bit.ly/94oyaQ

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:39:07 UTC
    • Xidram Xidram jake todd

      @dread However, if the consumer doesn't mind spending all the extra money and demands highest quality possible, then A is the better buy.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:39:18 UTC
    • jake todd jake todd Xidram

      @xidram I said B was the right choice. A was the better choice because it's a better good

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:39:33 UTC
    • Xidram Xidram jake todd

      @dread I think the conflict we're having is use of "choice". I'm using it as the selection. You're using it as the product being selected.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:40:55 UTC
    • jake todd jake todd Xidram

      @xidram that may be it.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:43:42 UTC
    • Stav Prodromou Stav Prodromou Xidram

      @xidram OK. One more shot: Patents are already the law of the land. It is the #unpatent forces that have to lobby to get guns #unpointed.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:44:49 UTC
    • jake todd jake todd Stav Prodromou

      @stav unpointed?

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:45:29 UTC
    • Xidram Xidram Stav Prodromou

      @stav This is true. What I was referring to was lobbying for more legislation rather than repealing the legislation already in effect.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:46:36 UTC
    • jake todd jake todd Stav Prodromou

      @stav also, appeal to authority

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:48:23 UTC
    • frankenspock frankenspock Stav Prodromou

      Careful, @stav. You're coming dangerously close to being in disagreement with the mob and getting Banished From the Island.

      Wednesday, 03-Mar-10 23:48:50 UTC
      Hippy Steve likes this.
    • Stav Prodromou Stav Prodromou frankenspock

      @frankenspock Don't want that. I like this island. It has a lot of #free thinkers. Pretty smart ones, matter of fact.

      Thursday, 04-Mar-10 00:35:39 UTC

Site notice

  • API
  • Status

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Identi.ca is a microblogging service brought to you by Status.net. It runs the StatusNet microblogging software, version 1.1.0-alpha1, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Identi.ca content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to mobile site layout.

Built in Montreal