Identi.ca Identi.ca
  • Login
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular

Conversation

Notices

  1. Peter Brown Peter Brown

    Join us for lunchtime drinks to discuss Bilski and the next steps in our campaign http://www.fsf.org/blogs/bilski-party-come-what-may

    Monday, 28-Jun-10 14:09:35 UTC from web
    • John Sullivan, Matt Lee and Richard Stallman Political Notes and 5 others like this.
    • Brett Smith, Osama Khalid and Danny Piccirillo repeated this.
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Free Software Foundation

      Here it is! #SCOTUS #Bilski opinion. Does it change anything for #swpats? Everyone (!sflc, !fsf, etc) start reading now: http://ur1.ca/0em2c

      Monday, 28-Jun-10 14:46:40 UTC
      Osama Khalid likes this.
    • Fabian Scherschel Fabian Scherschel Bradley M. Kuhn

      @bkuhn I am waiting with baited breath for your opinion...

      Monday, 28-Jun-10 14:48:33 UTC
    • Morten Juhl-Johansen Zölde-Fejér Morten Juhl-Johansen Zölde-Fejér Bradley M. Kuhn , Fabian Scherschel

      @fabsh @bkuhn +1 on that.

      Monday, 28-Jun-10 14:49:19 UTC
    • Jan Wildeboer Jan Wildeboer Richard Fontana

      @fontana so what is preferred test?

      Monday, 28-Jun-10 14:52:56 UTC
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Fabian Scherschel , Morten Juhl-Johansen Zölde-Fejér

      @fabsh, @mjjzf, I won't have an opinion myself until I hear what Dan Ravicher's opinion is. He's the patent lawyer I talk to for such things

      Monday, 28-Jun-10 14:53:41 UTC
    • Deb Nicholson Deb Nicholson Bradley M. Kuhn

      @bkuhn "This is an unpatentable abstract idea, just like the algorithms at issue in Benson and Flook. " certainly sounds promising. "

      Monday, 28-Jun-10 14:54:17 UTC
    • Morten Juhl-Johansen Zölde-Fejér Morten Juhl-Johansen Zölde-Fejér Bradley M. Kuhn , Fabian Scherschel

      @bkuhn @fabsh So you'll need to talk to your roving and roaming reporter on that. We stay tuned.

      Monday, 28-Jun-10 14:54:36 UTC
    • Deb Nicholson Deb Nicholson Jan Wildeboer

      @jwildeboer It seems like they aren't suggesting a better test, just saying that "machine or transformation" is too narrow.

      Monday, 28-Jun-10 14:58:41 UTC
    • Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier

      It's too bad they don't teach lawyers / judges inverted pyramid style.

      Monday, 28-Jun-10 14:59:37 UTC
    • Deb Nicholson Deb Nicholson Jan Wildeboer

      @jwildeboer Which is bolstered by a bunch of Clintonian opining on the meaning of the word "process"

      Monday, 28-Jun-10 14:59:54 UTC
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn

      Though [machine/transformation] test… is important clue… is not sole test deciding whether invention is patent-eligible "process" ☹ #Bilski

      Monday, 28-Jun-10 15:02:47 UTC
    • Dave Neary Dave Neary Bradley M. Kuhn

      @bkuhn "In choosing such expansive terms [...] Congress plainly contemplated that the patent laws would be given wide scope."

      Monday, 28-Jun-10 15:24:15 UTC
    • Danny Piccirillo Danny Piccirillo GNU's Not Unix , Free Software Foundation , LibrePlanet

      !lp !gnu @peterb, I also just brought in a cotton candy machine! The !FSF office keeps getting better

      Monday, 28-Jun-10 15:41:45 UTC
      Danny Piccirillo likes this.

Site notice

  • API
  • Status

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Identi.ca is a microblogging service brought to you by Status.net. It runs the StatusNet microblogging software, version 1.1.0-alpha1, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Identi.ca content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to mobile site layout.

Built in Montreal