Conversation

Notices

1. Wojciech Ryrych Linux

   are domains http://foo.com and http://www.foo.com treated as different ones? !linux #admin

   Saturday, 04-Sep-10 18:34:30 UTC from Choqok
   • Wojciech Ryrych

     @richslxh thanks :)

     Saturday, 04-Sep-10 18:43:04 UTC
   • John

     @rrh maybe. www.foo.com is a subdomain of foo.com. normally, foo.com is routed to www.foo.com.

     Saturday, 04-Sep-10 18:43:52 UTC
   • Wojciech Ryrych John

     @beargeist Thanks buddy!

     Saturday, 04-Sep-10 18:52:48 UTC
   • Michał Andrzej Woźniak

     @rrh depends on the service you're running, and configuration of said service.

     Saturday, 04-Sep-10 18:53:08 UTC
   • thisisabore

     @rrh www.foo.com is a subdomain (should be a particular machine in fact) of the foo.com domain. Then of course, there are web redirects…

     Saturday, 04-Sep-10 19:42:26 UTC
   • ka’imi

     @rrh yes. www.x.y is one of infinite possible subdomains of x.y. But you can of course redirect one to the other.

     Saturday, 04-Sep-10 19:43:03 UTC
   • Guy Van Sanden

     @rrh That depends on how foo.com's dns and webserver handles them, but in principle: yes

     Saturday, 04-Sep-10 19:49:21 UTC
   • Wojciech Ryrych Linux , Guy Van Sanden , thisisabore , ka’imi , Michał Andrzej Woźniak

     @nocturn @kaimi @thisisabore @rysiek thanks guys! !Linux #domains

     Saturday, 04-Sep-10 19:57:14 UTC
   • Samat K Jain

     @rrh IMHO, making 'www' canonical is a bit antiquated, especially for branding purposes (yet everyone does it!). Better off putting http://

     Saturday, 04-Sep-10 22:00:26 UTC
   • Freedom <3 Freedom GNU Linux-libre project

     @rrh not if they are running !linuxlibre !!

     Sunday, 05-Sep-10 01:57:07 UTC