Identi.ca Identi.ca
  • Login
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular

Conversation

Notices

  1. Psychedelic Squid (is now at Fragdev) Psychedelic Squid (is now at Fragdev)

    @richslxh Well, I am a computer science student - good maths skills are kind of a must. ;p

    Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 10:30:58 UTC from web at R'lyeh
    • Psychedelic Squid (is now at Fragdev) Psychedelic Squid (is now at Fragdev)

      @richslxh Binary has no minimum number of digits. A byte does, and that is indeed 8 digits, but nobody was saying 101010 was a byte.

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 09:53:50 UTC
    • trekkele trekkele Ubuntu users , Linux

      @richslxh errr... 101010bin actually IS 42dec... check it on your calculator :) !ubuntu !linux

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 09:54:32 UTC
    • Matt Copperwaite Matt Copperwaite

      @richslxh why does binary have to be 8 digits minimum? That just defines an octet, or byte. Binary numbers can be displayed at any length.

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 09:56:12 UTC
    • Michał Andrzej Woźniak Michał Andrzej Woźniak

      @richslxh and, pray tell, how many "minimum" digits has decimal?.. 8-digit bin numbers are just something we got used to

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 10:00:48 UTC
    • Michał Andrzej Woźniak Michał Andrzej Woźniak

      @richslxh 1101 is a perfectly "proper" binary number (13 here); so is 110 (6). and hence, so is 101010. please refer to, e.g., ur1.ca/220mm

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 10:02:51 UTC
    • Chris Warburton Chris Warburton Linux

      @richslxh Seems he's a pragmatist. Having a pragmatic man endorsing GNU & !linux shows it's a viable choice, not a hippy's dream

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 10:04:56 UTC
    • Michał Andrzej Woźniak Michał Andrzej Woźniak

      @richslxh that's a problem with the tool you used to convert it, not with the noted number per se. 101010(bin) = 32 + 8 + 2(dec) = 42

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 10:07:58 UTC
    • Psychedelic Squid (is now at Fragdev) Psychedelic Squid (is now at Fragdev)

      @richslxh Uh, no. What the hell are you using that outputs that for 42 in binary?

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 10:08:39 UTC
    • Luke Slater Luke Slater

      Man this is a shit holy war, yes they are binary but computers express them in sets of 8

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 10:10:47 UTC
    • Psychedelic Squid (is now at Fragdev) Psychedelic Squid (is now at Fragdev)

      @richslxh Okay, yes, the text "42" is 0011010000110010 in binary, but 42 _as a number_ in binary is 101010 (or 00101010 as a whole byte).

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 10:11:51 UTC
    • Marcel van der Boom Marcel van der Boom

      @richslxh that is ascii code 52 (for the symbol 4) and ascii code 50 (for the symbol 2). So '42' not 42 (string vs number)

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 10:13:27 UTC
    • Psychedelic Squid (is now at Fragdev) Psychedelic Squid (is now at Fragdev)

      @richslxh Indeed, but I still don't see how that makes any difference to "people saying the !ubuntu launch date 101010 is 42 in binary?".

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 10:17:15 UTC
    • Psychedelic Squid (is now at Fragdev) Psychedelic Squid (is now at Fragdev)

      @richslxh Since, as far as I'm aware, nobody's been claiming that 101010 is the binary for "42" in ascii.

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 10:18:00 UTC
    • Luke Slater Luke Slater

      @richslxh doh. Looks like you just had a huh-huh moment :)

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 10:19:26 UTC
    • Psychedelic Squid (is now at Fragdev) Psychedelic Squid (is now at Fragdev)

      @richslxh Fair enough.

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 10:19:41 UTC
    • Matt Copperwaite Matt Copperwaite

      @richslxh most calculator programs will do it too in Advanced or Scientific mode.

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 10:24:27 UTC
    • Psychedelic Squid (is now at Fragdev) Psychedelic Squid (is now at Fragdev)

      @richslxh Nice, though I personally prefer to convert in my head (at least for 16-bit or smaller numbers, bigger ones are less pleasant).

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 10:24:42 UTC
    • Darren Fuller Darren Fuller

      @richslxh for fun we could do it as an IEEE-754 representation 1000010001010000000000000000000 :D

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 10:27:22 UTC
    • Matt Copperwaite Matt Copperwaite

      @richslxh actually I'm impressed with you doing everything in your head. I'm always reaching for the calculator :)

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 10:29:43 UTC
    • trekkele trekkele

      @richslxh: http://tinyurl.com/87hjt

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 11:47:56 UTC
    • Remote profile options...
      Carlos Perilla Carlos Perilla Stephen

      @mv When you hit the reply button on the web it appends the @mention to the textbox you can edit, If I auto add the @-m…

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 14:00:27 UTC
    • Michael Fötsch Michael Fötsch

      @richslxh Nah, 42 is clearly octal. If it were decimal, it would have...uhm...3.14 digits at least.

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 20:40:11 UTC
    • Remote profile options...
      Stephen Stephen Carlos Perilla

      @deepspawn hm...that is helpful to know, in finding a solution, obviously I am not informed on what happens in xmpp com…

      Wednesday, 13-Oct-10 22:19:55 UTC

Site notice

  • API
  • Status

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Identi.ca is a microblogging service brought to you by Status.net. It runs the StatusNet microblogging software, version 1.1.0-alpha1, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Identi.ca content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to mobile site layout.

Built in Montreal