Identi.ca Identi.ca
  • Login
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular

Conversation

Notices

  1. Jesús E. Franco Martínez Jesús E. Franco Martínez Alexandre Oliva

    RT @lxoliva: "[...]a Free license is neither necessary nor sufficient for a program to be Free" <what happened to 4 freedoms definition?

    Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:16:34 UTC from Choqok at Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva

      @tzk nothing happened to it. it says nothing about licenses, but rather about freedoms

      Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:18:51 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva

      @tzk say, if the copyright over a work expired, copyright doesn't take away your freedoms by default: you don't need any license

      Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:19:33 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva

      @tzk say, even if a a program is under a Free license, if you're denied access to sources, you lose essential freedoms

      Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:20:46 UTC
      Jesús E. Franco Martínez likes this.
    • Jesús E. Franco Martínez Jesús E. Franco Martínez Alexandre Oliva

      @lxoliva to avoid misunderstandings, i agree blobs in kernel sources, no matter its license, because they aren't source code, are not #FaiF

      Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:22:20 UTC
    • Jesús E. Franco Martínez Jesús E. Franco Martínez Alexandre Oliva

      @lxoliva yes, i agree with that, but not with tagging as "bad" software like Firefox or Thunderbird, since you can read source code.

      Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:24:02 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva

      @tzk aah, I see. yeah, that's a different line. those *are* Free Software, even though at least Firefox is also Free Bait

      Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:28:49 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva

      @tzk in that it induces users to install non-Free Software, such as non-Free plugins

      Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:29:31 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva

      @tzk if I were to create a package to warn about these programs, I'd probably name it freed-ora-fsdg or so, but it's not in my roadmap

      Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:30:20 UTC
    • Jesús E. Franco Martínez Jesús E. Franco Martínez Alexandre Oliva

      @lxoliva may be, but i really care about the licenses of plugins and i don't use non-free-plugins. But the main app stills free.

      Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:30:53 UTC
    • Jesús E. Franco Martínez Jesús E. Franco Martínez Mono Free , Alexandre Oliva

      @lxoliva oh that really helps to clear the question. btw, i think would be even more necessary a fedora- !monofree package or so.

      Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:32:50 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva

      @tzk right. Free Bait is most dangerous for those who can't see the hook ;-)

      Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:35:43 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva

      @tzk well, that's yet another dimension of freedom. mono is a different kind of trap. it's Free, but it invites into a patent trap

      Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:37:02 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva

      @tzk I'd rather not promote the confusion that patents render software non-Free

      Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:39:06 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva

      @tzk but I wouldn't mind if distros offered meta-packages that conflicted with potentially undesirable components

      Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:40:50 UTC
    • Jesús E. Franco Martínez Jesús E. Franco Martínez Alexandre Oliva

      @lxoliva yes, but based on some experiences, i think education works better than locks because it works even without engagement of packagers

      Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:41:23 UTC
    • Jesús E. Franco Martínez Jesús E. Franco Martínez Alexandre Oliva

      @lxoliva do you mean, packages than could help fedora users to avoid completely non-free software? It would be a great tool!

      Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:47:23 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva

      @tzk yeah. like, fedora itself could supply something along the lines of freed-ora-freedom, that conflicted with firmware (and kernel)

      Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:51:03 UTC
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva

      @tzk and also a mono-trap-free package that conflicted with the base mono packages, and so on

      Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:51:31 UTC
    • Jesús E. Franco Martínez Jesús E. Franco Martínez Alexandre Oliva

      @lxoliva there was a package for ubuntu called "monononono" :D for avoiding, even removing yet installed, mono crap.

      Wednesday, 01-Dec-10 06:54:35 UTC

Site notice

  • API
  • Status

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Identi.ca is a microblogging service brought to you by Status.net. It runs the StatusNet microblogging software, version 1.1.0-alpha1, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Identi.ca content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to mobile site layout.

Built in Montreal