Identi.ca Identi.ca
  • Login
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular

Conversation

Notices

  1. Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Wayne Borean , Safe World for Women

    RT @mamadelbosque: @_the_mad_hatter @Emma_A @safeworld4women isn't that freaking awful? Just the US & freaking Somalia.

    about a year ago from seesmic at Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada
    • satipera satipera

      @themadhatter Could not find context but if you are surprised at some of the minority company USA keeps then that surprises me.

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean satipera

      @satipera U.S.A. and Somalia are the only members of the United Nations that haven't ratified the 'Rights of the Child' treaty.

      about a year ago
    • satipera satipera

      @themadhatter I thought it would be something like that. It does not surprise me in the least.

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter I just read the text...as a citizen and as a parent, I hope we *don't* sign it.

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Susan Stewart

      @hedgemage OK, why?

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter It's very poorly worded. There are provisions that could be used to force the US to infringe on families' and states' rights.

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter It's hard to cover in 140-char blobs... feel free to jabber me: hedgemage@jabber.binaryredneck.net

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Susan Stewart

      @hedgemage You think our negotiators were stupid enough to sign, and your's weren't? What's your logic. 140 chars is good, teaches discipine

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter Some parts effect the US in ways different from other nations, because of our constitution's limits on federal government.

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter Others, like forced registration of all children, and something eerily like the fairness doctrine, are just plain scary.

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Susan Stewart

      @hedgemage So in other words there are defects in your ancient constitution.

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter Censorship and barriers to interracial adoption go on the "scary" list.

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Susan Stewart

      @hedgemage Why is registration scary? We've had it for over a century, no problems. Except for child abusers. The don't like it.

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Susan Stewart

      @hedgemage Re Fairness Doctrine, so you believe that broadcasters shouldn't tell the truth?

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter It's been used to take DNA profiles without parental consent, to aid government seizure of childrens' medical records, etc.

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter I believe that the government shouldn't get to decide what is true, and silence dissenters.

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Susan Stewart

      @hedgemage What censorship? What 'barriers to interracial adoption'

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter The constitution is right: child welfare should not be the purview of federal gov in a country as large and diverse as the US.

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Susan Stewart

      @hedgemage You can get a DNA profile without parental consent anytime. The document is called a search warrant. American courts use them.

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Susan Stewart

      @hedgemage Court orders are also used for medical records, very useful in prosecuting incest cases.

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Susan Stewart

      @hedgemage Why shouldn't it be?

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter Article 17 section (e), Article 20 section 3

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter Just because something can be used for good, that doesn't mean it won't also be used for evil.

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Susan Stewart

      @hedgemage Sending me the section of the Constitution isn't an answer as to why the constitution is right.

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Susan Stewart

      @hedgemage so because the Constitution could be used for Evil, you shouldn't change it?

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter Each state in the US is more like its own nation, from the perspective of outsiders. Different cultures with different needs.

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter Search warrants in the US require due process, the DNA seizures in Texas were done without it in the name of "registration"

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Susan Stewart

      @hedgemage So what does that have to do with anything?

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter Those weren't references to our constitution but passages in the treaty re: censorship and barriers to interracial adoption.

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Susan Stewart

      @hedgemage And what does the DNA seizures in Texas have to do with the Convention on the Rights of the Child? FYI, I'm a Mormon.

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Susan Stewart

      @hedgemage And why did you reference them, without explaining what the problem with them is?

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter The US Constitution was written to prevent abuses of power by denying the government power to begin with...

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter ...if they don't have a registry of children, its much harder to apply regulations to children on a national scale.

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter it was a direct answer to your question, in the order asked, and had to be within the character limit

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Susan Stewart

      @hedgemage I probably know the U.S. Constitution better than you do, I read it regularly You haven't explained why it would block the treaty

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Susan Stewart

      @hedgemage Why do you need a registry of children?

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter Apparently you don't: this treaty would require action on the part of the US government that exceeds its enumerated powers.

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter We don't, but the treaty requires one: Article 7 section 1

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter Have you read the treaty, or just news reports about it?

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Susan Stewart

      @hedgemage How?

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Susan Stewart

      @hedgemage Have a copy open in another Windows.

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter The federal government is not empowered to create any child welfare law or education law, to provide medical care, etc.

      about a year ago
    • Wayne Borean Wayne Borean Susan Stewart

      @hedgemage So, get the states to do it. If they refuse, cut their funding, or kick them out of the Union.

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter That's not constitutional, actually. The feds cannot regulate it AT ALL, nor can they "kick [states] out of the union"

      about a year ago
    • Susan Stewart Susan Stewart

      @themadhatter What rampant human rights violations do you think this treaty will fix, in the US or elsewhere, and how?

      about a year ago

Site notice

  • API
  • Status

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Identi.ca is a microblogging service brought to you by Status.net. It runs the StatusNet microblogging software, version 1.1.0-alpha1, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Identi.ca content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to mobile site layout.

Built in Montreal