Conversation
Notices
-
@fontana Even if FaiF, it introduces a silly complexity that's at the very least #problematic, as is calling it "BSD-style"
-
Heard of HTSQL via pycon, says it has "BSD style license" but that's misleading… limitation to certain databases makes it ultimately nonfree
-
http://htsql.org/license.txt or at least, I'm pretty damned sure this is nonfree? Regardless, #communitylicensefail
-
Heh, license says "your db must use OSI-approved license" & site says ~"Although this licensing strategy does not conform with OSI criteria"
-
@cwebber fork, patch with extensions to free dbs, merge?
-
@nuclearsandwich Has free db support, & its "community license" is limited to free dbs, in a way that ironically makes it nonfree (I think)
-
@cwebber I saw that, and would tend to agree. That isn't a viable open source profit model since the code isn't open source just public.
-
@fontana Ha, how curious. Tho license means might fail to work w/ other databases which have a similarly free but OSI-incompliant license ;)
-
@fontana but what about freedom 0?
-
@fontana any supporting evidence for this apparent contradiction with “run the software for *any* purpose”?
-
@fontana Although iirc @bkuhn (and the FSF?) say that the term "BSD-style" is itself #problematic, but this more than most
-