Identi.ca Identi.ca
  • Login
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular

Conversation

Notices

  1. Clacke Moved to Parlementum Clacke Moved to Parlementum Firefox , Electronic Frontier Foundation , Richard Fontana

    @fontana Since !eff HTTPSEverywhere showed up I haven't wanted Chromium. Since !Firefox 4 showed up I haven't needed Chromium. :-)

    about a year ago from web
    • Osama Khalid likes this.
    • Osama Khalid, cypherpunk and Samat K Jain repeated this.
    • Fabian Scherschel Fabian Scherschel Bradley M. Kuhn , Allison Randal

      @bkuhn BTW, unsurprisingly you get many mentions in the upcoming LO interview with @allisonrandal. :)

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn disturbing , Fabian Scherschel

      @fabsh, Not surprised, but it's !disturbing. I honestly didn't mean to set myself up as leader of #Harmony opposition;it just sorta happened

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Fabian Scherschel

      @fabsh, & despite my rantings, I'd say my position on #Harmony isn't actually complete opposition yet, but extremely deep skepticism.

      about a year ago
    • Fabian Scherschel Fabian Scherschel Bradley M. Kuhn

      @bkuhn Actually, it's all very civil and there's a lot of mutual respect. Unsurprising, I'm on your side. :)

      about a year ago
    • Fabian Scherschel Fabian Scherschel Bradley M. Kuhn

      @bkuhn It was a good interview, will be out in 204. I'm sure you'll like it! :)

      about a year ago
    • Simon Phipps Simon Phipps Bradley M. Kuhn

      @bkuhn I'm grateful to you for it in a way as I had that role in some minds for a while.

      about a year ago
    • Dave Neary Dave Neary Bradley M. Kuhn , Simon Phipps

      @webmink You, @bkuhn, @mmeeks, and myself are the most visible people arguing that copyright assignment has bad side-effects.

      about a year ago
    • Dave Neary Dave Neary Simon Phipps

      @webmink The Gang of Four, they could call us. Except that I haven't engaged in the process at all

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Dave Neary

      @nearyd,well, #Harmony is complicated in part b/c it's #CLA not ©AA. CLAs aren't so bad for permissive projects; it's copyleft that's harmed

      about a year ago
    • Dave Neary Dave Neary Bradley M. Kuhn

      @bkuhn #Harmony is dangerous because it conflates a bunch of stuff, some of which is good, some not so much.

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Dave Neary

      @nearyd, yeah, I agree that #Harmony is conflating things. I hope next month sometime to have time for an omnibus blog post to suss it out.

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Richard Fontana

      @fontana, As I've told you, You *really* need to write up a coherent essay/blog post on these issues. Your dents are helpful,but not enough!

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Richard Fontana

      @fontana, yeah, but does an #Apache -esque #CLA necessarily give away all that much more than the #Apache license itself does?

      about a year ago
    • Dave Neary Dave Neary Bradley M. Kuhn

      @bkuhn ie: affirm contribution ownership & legal review, copyright licensing/assignment, 3rd party copyrights, guarantee freedom, etc

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Richard Fontana

      @fontana, give yourself more credit. To be brutally honest: IMO you're undervaluing your potential contribution as a procrastination tactic.

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Dave Neary

      @nearyd, OTOH, putting some of things together in a #CLA has some value, but I see why you say it's conflating issues. It's complicated.

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Richard Fontana

      @fontana, yes, this is the part where your argument is weak: *merely* perception problems are rarely show-stoppers that require rejection.

      about a year ago
    • Dave Neary Dave Neary Richard Fontana

      @fontana clarifying patent license, trying to address the "future free licence" issue, affirming ownership of contributions are all good.

      about a year ago
      Mike Linksvayer likes this.
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Tom "spot" Callaway , Richard Fontana

      @fontana, I think I'd need @spot to tell me why himself to understand. @spot, you should write an essay on why you won't. It'd be v. useful.

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Richard Fontana

      @fontana, I fully agree: must limit agreements contributors must sign; but it's also important we be sure they contributed © under license

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Linux , Richard Fontana

      @fontana, I'm somewhat convinced !Linux Signed-Off-By is *very* close to working well for this;it's flaw is tech/license signoff conflation

      about a year ago
    • Tom Marble Tom Marble Richard Fontana

      @fontana yes, I like your *lex mercatoria*, but how do we combat this immediate #swpats threat?

      about a year ago
    • Simon Phipps Simon Phipps Richard Fontana

      @fontana On the contrary, I think your perspective needs publishing for reference by many people. Please do it. Happy to co-author :-)

      about a year ago
    • Brian van den Broek Brian van den Broek Richard Fontana

      @fontana Add one data point. I'd like to read that which @bkhun attempts to goad you to write.

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Richard Fontana

      @fontana, I grok tradeoff. Of course one's never "sure" (it's like proving a program correct). But some #CLA -ish things could be compromise

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Linux , Richard Fontana

      @fontana,well, #SCO was a close call. It was possible their claims weren't baseless& !Linux didn't know. But Signed-Off-By prob handled this

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Richard Fontana

      @fontana,my question is does Signed-Off-By increase certainty in #SCO -like situation? I think it does; you might argue it's all perception

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Linux , Richard Fontana

      @fontana, yes, indeed, that's the remedy. It could make sense, though, in case of pre-meditated fraud by an #Evil Genius !Linux developer.

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn The GNU General Public License , Richard Fontana

      @fontana,I'm fully convinced #Harmony is complete #FAIL for !GPL & probably other #copyleft licensing. Question is: "is ok for permissive?"

      about a year ago
      Rob Myers likes this.
    • MJ Ray MJ Ray Richard Fontana

      @fontana #gpl 3 is a design by committee horror, sadly. I think redhat were part of the committees

      about a year ago
      Ricardo Dias Marques likes this.
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Richard Fontana

      @fontana, YA critique of #Harmony you should write: "Do individuals take more personal risk signing #CLA than exists when inbound=outbound?"

      about a year ago
    • Tom Marble Tom Marble Richard Fontana

      @fontana don't forget the CRAZY CAPS for disclaimer and waiver sections (gotta be "conspicuous" UCC § 2 .. at least no html blink!)

      about a year ago
    • Fabian Scherschel Fabian Scherschel Richard Fontana

      @fontana Heh. Scary thought....

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn The GNU General Public License , Richard Fontana

      @fontana, No, I grok this danger completely! But does it matter if it replaces only the *permissive* ones? !GPL & #copyleft's are different.

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn The GNU General Public License , Richard Stallman Political Notes , MJ Ray

      @mjray, IMO you're somewhat mistaken re: !GPLv3 in this regard. @rms wrote most of it;only some subsections have that committee weirdness.

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Richard Fontana

      @fontana,Can never tell:when you quote my phrase ("!GPLv3: Better copyleft for users and developers") are you mocking me or giving me props?

      about a year ago
      Leif Ryge likes this.
    • Tom Marble Tom Marble Bradley M. Kuhn

      @bkuhn does it matter if CLA's, in effect, attempt to marginalize copyleft projects?

      about a year ago
    • Rob Myers Rob Myers MJ Ray

      @mjray: GPL3 is also a model of compromise. It upsets just about everyone equally ;-)

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Richard Stallman Political Notes , Richard Fontana

      @fontana, I used to agree, but on some seemingly !distrubing points, where it looks like result of lobbying, @rms actually had other reasons

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn disturbing , Tom Marble

      @tmarble, yes, using #CLA's to marginalize #copyleft projects is !disturbing. No one knows for sure yet if #Harmony will do that: it might.

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn The GNU General Public License , Richard Stallman Political Notes , Richard Fontana

      @fontana,of course not! But I'm saying something better: on many compromises in !GPLv3, @rms actually had reasons lobbyists didn't even know

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn The GNU General Public License , Richard Fontana

      @fontana,you flatter me, sir! But I deeply regret I allowed myself to be manipulated by "PowersThatBe" from meaningful involvement in !GPLv3

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn The GNU General Public License , Richard Fontana

      @fontana, Note that PowersThatBe also pushed #novalis out of the !GPLv3 process eventually as well. & marginalized other TBs as well.

      about a year ago
    • Rob Myers Rob Myers Richard Fontana

      @fontana: gah! I'm old!!!1 ;-)

      about a year ago
    • Paul Visscher Paul Visscher Bradley M. Kuhn

      @bkuhn All of this talk about TPTB is making me think of Angel, though TPTB in this context sounds more like Wolfram and Hart...

      about a year ago
    • Dan Scott Dan Scott Bradley M. Kuhn

      @bkuhn FWIW, I raised the question about #copyleft licensing and outbound licenses on the #Harmony review list at http://ur1.ca/3y35y

      about a year ago
    • Dan Scott Dan Scott Richard Fontana

      @fontana I noted concern about license part of CLA conflicting with inbound software license on #Harmony review list at http://ur1.ca/3y39h

      about a year ago
    • Simon Phipps Simon Phipps Richard Fontana

      @fontana I'm not sure I agree. There's a long-term threat as those patents hit the secondary market. See http://wp.me/pH8ns-8F

      about a year ago
    • Fabian Scherschel Fabian Scherschel Richard Fontana

      @fontana What did it do?

      about a year ago
    • Justin O'Brien Justin O'Brien Richard Fontana

      @fontana what disturbing behaiour

      about a year ago
    • Justin O'Brien Justin O'Brien Richard Fontana

      @fontana grr sorry... What disturbing behavior in particular? #skepticalaboutgooglesopensource #scroogle

      about a year ago
    • Germán Póo-Caamaño Germán Póo-Caamaño Bradley M. Kuhn , Richard Fontana

      @fontana @bkuhn Are CLA & CAA at the same level? I would say CLA are friendlier (or less un-friendlier) than CAA.

      about a year ago
    • Justin O'Brien Justin O'Brien Richard Fontana

      @fontana ahh I thought it was gonna be something juicy :)

      about a year ago
    • Fabian Scherschel Fabian Scherschel Richard Fontana

      @fontana Ah, get it. :)

      about a year ago
    • Simon Phipps Simon Phipps Richard Fontana

      @fontana But since the Apache license expressly permits that same proprietisation it's not clear their CLA is an issue.

      about a year ago
    • Simon Phipps Simon Phipps Richard Fontana

      @fontana Needed largely because of corporate-inspired caution, I believe.

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Richard Fontana , Germán Póo-Caamaño

      @gpoo, it's complicated. @fontana has a point that many #CLA's act much like ©AAs in disguise. Depends on what CLA says, of course.

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Paul Visscher

      @paulv,Yes, TPTB I refer to are akin to senior partners at Wolfram & Hart. #Angel's theme that law firms are center of corruption was genius

      about a year ago
    • Dave Neary Dave Neary Richard Fontana

      @fontana I was under the impression that they all did. 2.1(c) - am I reading it wrong? #Harmony

      about a year ago
    • Dave Neary Dave Neary Richard Fontana

      @fontana But surely the contributor must have patent rights to grant the contributee a license? I am not following you.

      about a year ago
    • Dave Neary Dave Neary Richard Fontana

      @fontana I think I understand. The contributor doesn't get a patent licence for the rest of the code, not his. Is that what you mean?

      about a year ago
    • Dave Neary Dave Neary Richard Fontana

      @fontana In which case, since patent grant is transferable, a patent license to users can happen on distribution (in SW license), no?

      about a year ago
    • Dave Neary Dave Neary Richard Fontana

      @fontana You should mention this to Allison. I'm sure the intention is there, just needs to be spelled out.

      about a year ago
    • Clacke Moved to Parlementum Clacke Moved to Parlementum Bradley M. Kuhn , Richard Fontana

      @fontana Apparently GPLv3 was drafted by vampires and @bkuhn is keeping a lid on it to avoid seeming insane.

      about a year ago
      Bradley M. Kuhn likes this.
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn

      @clacke, #Whedon's thesis: "I believe the subtext here is rapidly becoming text" (said by Giles on #Buffy) But I mean only subtext part here

      about a year ago
    • Denver Gingerich Denver Gingerich

      I concur with @clacke: I used to use #Chromium because #Firefox was too slow, but #FF4 is much faster. And has add-ons I want.

      about a year ago

Site notice

  • API
  • Status

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Identi.ca is a microblogging service brought to you by Status.net. It runs the StatusNet microblogging software, version 1.1.0-alpha1, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Identi.ca content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to mobile site layout.

Built in Montreal