Conversation
Notices
-
@fontana at most one wants a good way to embed StatusNet threads/comment form on-page http://sngpl.ma/t4Cm1
-
For those watching at home, @fontana found another place where I referred to #RedHatLegal re: #Fedora copyright notice http://bit.ly/mQCfwQ
-
@quaid, I often pondered if "All Rights Reserved" contradicts !GPLv2 incompatibly. !Disturbing #Webbink "laid it down" w/out addressing that
-
@bkuhn © is NOT "primarily attribution mechanism" but a notice of Copyright. You software folks ought to be ahead of the curve on this one.
-
@bkuhn I suspect it was more evolving thinking to have "All Rights Rsevered"
-
-
@laurelrusswurm In the context of the GPL, that's the wrong message; by design, it preserves rights across acts of dissemination.
-
@laurelrusswurm In cc term, `rights severed' a nice jesty summary of cc0, whereas `revered' is like cc-BY-SA,
-
@fontana, it's in detailed discussion (that's linked from URL you mention). Direct is: http://ur1.ca/4blel See "It's not my work anymore" §
-
@fontana,why's it !disturbing? #Fame is a major factor in human life & a reason many !FaiF devs get involved. #ESR was right about this part
-
@fontana,I'm surprised you believe "All Rights Reserved" is tacky & silly,given that your department (!RedHat legal) "lays it down" so often
-
Bradley M. Kuhn
The GNU General Public License
, Richard Stallman Political Notes
, Richard Fontana
, Brian van den Broek
@vanden, @rms once promulgated "All Rights Reversed" as shorthand for !GPL in ©notice;Never caught on &is somewhat inaccurate (Cc @fontana)
-
@bkuhn @fontana !Debian bug 388141 contains some interesting discussion on Debian website copyright. http://ur1.ca/4blzv
-
@laurelrusswurm, IMO you're conflating denotative & connotative meanings of !copyright notices. @fontana & I were discussing the connotative
-
@bkuhn I agree `reversed' isn't too accurate. I halfway think my tongue in cheek suggestion *is* accurate; in spirit of 4 freedoms. :-)
-
@parsifal, thanks for pointing out !Debian bug 388141: http://ur1.ca/4blzv I've just commented there to volunteer to help. (Cc: @fontana)
-
@fontana there was also a series remake!
-
@fontana brief history of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_rights_reversed supposedly starts in 1960s also "wrongs" http://ur1.ca/28zzg
-
@fontana, well, I see your problem right there. You're busy frying fish instead of doing legal work. Now your hippy kingdom makes sense!
-
"What's this '…and the rest' crap?!?" I wrote a blog post about #GilligansIsland #copyright notices: http://ur1.ca/4k3am !RedHat !Debian
-
I agree: !Debian should fix its website's copyright statements and licensing ♺ @bkuhn: ... http://ur1.ca/4k3am
-
@bkuhn Notice has legal role only, don't look to it to solve other problems like attribution. Not its job in the scheme of things
-
@bkuhn Chek this: http://blog.ninapaley.com/2011/06/27/credit-is-due/ (identi.ca is painful, can't you enable comments on your blog??)
-
@davidejavacorner,"enable comments"="do extra work I've no time for". Choices are: (a) comment here,(b) comment by email, (c) ignore my blog
-
@davidejavacorner, I'm not surprised Nina has that position on attribution. I think problem here is more logistical than intended plagiarism
-
@bkuhn I don't think “status update” maps very well to “comment on a blog entry” function. so OStatus & StatusNet aren't good options IMO.
-
@bkuhn I agree that "…and the rest" mention would be better than status quo for !debian website, hence #632175 http://ur1.ca/4kxwf
-
All Identi.ca content and data are available under the