Conversation
Notices
-
@fontana does this imply that I can charge 100 human souls per copy of my software? /cc @bkuhn #troll
-
IBM's solution to the high download bandwidth OOo might demand from Apache? Charge $1/download: http://bit.ly/jYkF88
-
@webmink now that's what I call smart!
-
@bkuhn Read on in the thread and you'll see "For example, ASF could take bids and award a contracts to providers". Really.
-
@bkuhn As I understand it, (L)GPL explicitly permits charging for downloads.
-
@webmink, & #TDF could do the same for !LibreOffice, right? Someone suggesting a stupid idea isn't the same as doing it. !Apache !OpenOffice
-
Permissive licensing is !problematic b/c developers who spend 99.99% of their time writing proprietary sw can still be key community members
-
@webmink And I assume using torrents to share the load has not occurred to them? :p
-
@bkuhn Did you relicense it under a Free license when you secured ownership of it?
-
@rrix, seller provided me w/ a jar that he said contained his soul (jar was in ebay photo). I lost track of jar in my 2011 move to Cambridge
-
@bkuhn Hmm... and you seemed like such a nice guy :o
-
@bkuhn Uh oh, you lost his soul? :(
-
@rrix, I was never really clear on container rules. I did open the jar & wondered if it'd release the soul or not. Jar wasn't airtight,FWIW.
-