Conversation
Notices
-
I had A LONG discussion with @bkuhn on this yesterday http://identi.ca/conversation/73205287
about a year ago from xmpp-
@fontana So Red Hat is really a newspaper? :D
Brian van den Broek likes this. -
@fontana, !disturbing part is when you redistribute sw from your #RHEL subscription, !RedHat says: "Where's your subscription now, SEE!?!?!"
-
@bkuhn Indeed, this is what happens when there is nobody to say "this does not constitute legal advice" and correct terminology hehe:)
-
@bkuhn Are there real examples of Red Hat pulling support from source redistributors, or is it just a club-like clause in the contract?
-
@fontana even more complicated when you are from country when the “approval of using the work is made by contract" (old Czech Copyright Act)
-
♻ @bkuhn: @fontana, #disturbing when you redistribute sw from your subscription, Red Hat says: "Where's your subscription now, SEE!?!?!"
-
@fontana who is redistributor here? CentOS (which I am afraid many will understand) or IBM/HP (selling their comps bundled with RHEL)?
-
@onedot no IMHO he genuinely distrusts any commercial involvement in the FLOSS world.
-
I thought so, but I was afraid that you could be too easily misunderstood (as if we had some separate contract with CentOS).
-
@fontana I don't think even Kantians are completely consistent in their opinions. ;)
-
D'oh! It is THIS thread :(