Identi.ca Identi.ca
  • Login
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular

Conversation

Notices

  1. Matěj Cepl Matěj Cepl Bradley M. Kuhn

    I had A LONG discussion with @bkuhn on this yesterday http://identi.ca/conversation/73205287

    about a year ago from xmpp
    • Dan Lynch Dan Lynch Bradley M. Kuhn , Richard Fontana

      @fontana @bkuhn Well we can argue over terminology but with #RHEL the value to both customer and Red Hat is the support and services.

      about a year ago
    • Dan Lynch Dan Lynch Bradley M. Kuhn , Richard Fontana

      @fontana @bkuhn I've heard RH people call it that. Maybe "support contract" is more strictly accurate word but we all know what it means :)

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Red Hat , Dan Lynch , Richard Fontana

      @methoddan, @fontana is technically correct license is wrong word to use there but I too have many times heard !RedHat ppl call #RHEL that.

      about a year ago
    • Dan Lynch Dan Lynch Bradley M. Kuhn , Richard Fontana

      @bkuhn @fontana That was my response earlier. I know the term "support license" isn't strictly accurate but even Red Hat people use it.

      about a year ago
    • Dan Lynch Dan Lynch Bradley M. Kuhn , Richard Fontana

      @fontana @bkuhn I know you're a lawyer but I think you're just being pedantic. We all know what we're talking about. We will correct it.

      about a year ago
    • Dan Lynch Dan Lynch Bradley M. Kuhn , Richard Fontana

      @fontana As @bkuhn says send some feedback and we can include it :)

      about a year ago
    • Fabian Scherschel Fabian Scherschel Dan Lynch , Richard Fontana

      @methoddan I think @fontana should send some guitar feedback à la #TINAP! :D

      about a year ago
      Andy C, Richard Fontana and Hilton Garcia Fernandes like this.
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Red Hat , Richard Fontana

      @fontana, Didn't think "#RHEL support license" was official. I've heard it used unofficially by !RedHat people. "Support contract" standard?

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Red Hat , Richard Fontana

      @fontana, the !RedHat #RHEL "subscription" is still a "contract" in a legal sense, right? So,subscription is just marketing mumbo jumbo, no?

      about a year ago
    • Fabian Scherschel Fabian Scherschel Richard Fontana

      @fontana So Red Hat is really a newspaper? :D

      about a year ago
      Brian van den Broek likes this.
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Red Hat , disturbing , Richard Fontana

      @fontana, !disturbing part is when you redistribute sw from your #RHEL subscription, !RedHat says: "Where's your subscription now, SEE!?!?!"

      about a year ago
    • Dan Lynch Dan Lynch karen sandler , Richard Fontana

      @fontana No worries. I wouldn't complain over something like that. This is what happens when @kaz isn't around to keep us in line/correct :)

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Free as in Freedom , Dan Lynch , karen sandler

      @methoddan, yeah, @kaz'll be rotfl'ing when she hears this:"I go away for two episodes & you go & call a 'contract', a 'license'?" !FaifCast

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Dan Lynch , Richard Fontana

      @fontana,BTW,which of us said "support license" anyway? Not to cast blame, but I should have indeed known better. @methoddan can be forgiven

      about a year ago
    • Dan Lynch Dan Lynch Bradley M. Kuhn

      @bkuhn Indeed, this is what happens when there is nobody to say "this does not constitute legal advice" and correct terminology hehe:)

      about a year ago
    • Marvin Vek Marvin Vek Red Hat , Richard Fontana

      @fontana Maybe you can tell me why @bkuhn keeps whining (about) !redhat 2+ months now. Does he work for Red Had or is he a genuine troll?

      about a year ago
    • Dan Lynch Dan Lynch Bradley M. Kuhn , Richard Fontana

      @bkuhn @fontana It was probably me

      about a year ago
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn The GNU General Public License , Richard Fontana

      @fontana, I effectively say that too in my initial !GPL enforcement letters. I'm tempted to put it literally in there, but I won't do it.

      about a year ago
    • Dan Scott Dan Scott Bradley M. Kuhn

      @bkuhn Are there real examples of Red Hat pulling support from source redistributors, or is it just a club-like clause in the contract?

      about a year ago
    • Matěj Cepl Matěj Cepl Richard Fontana

      @fontana even more complicated when you are from country when the “approval of using the work is made by contract" (old Czech Copyright Act)

      about a year ago
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva Bradley M. Kuhn , Richard Fontana

      ♻ @bkuhn: @fontana, #disturbing when you redistribute sw from your subscription, Red Hat says: "Where's your subscription now, SEE!?!?!"

      about a year ago
    • Matěj Cepl Matěj Cepl Richard Fontana

      @fontana who is redistributor here? CentOS (which I am afraid many will understand) or IBM/HP (selling their comps bundled with RHEL)?

      about a year ago
    • Matěj Cepl Matěj Cepl Marvin Vek

      @onedot no IMHO he genuinely distrusts any commercial involvement in the FLOSS world.

      about a year ago
    • Matěj Cepl Matěj Cepl

      I thought so, but I was afraid that you could be too easily misunderstood (as if we had some separate contract with CentOS).

      about a year ago
    • Matěj Cepl Matěj Cepl Richard Fontana

      @fontana I don't think even Kantians are completely consistent in their opinions. ;)

      about a year ago
    • Matěj Cepl Matěj Cepl

      D'oh! It is THIS thread :(

      about a year ago

Site notice

  • API
  • Status

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Identi.ca is a microblogging service brought to you by Status.net. It runs the StatusNet microblogging software, version 1.1.0-alpha1, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Identi.ca content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to mobile site layout.

Built in Montreal