Conversation
Notices
-
I really hope Laconica isn't renamed Identica. It introduces more confusion than it resolves, IMHO. Wordpress v wordpress.com doesn't apply.
-
@kshep I think it's a good idea. Laconica isn't that good of a name anyway..... ;)
-
@kshep I agree - a service and the software it runs are two different things and should have different names
-
@evan http://laconi.ca/trac is down
-
@evan You do risk the Jabber effect. It's hard to say whether you're in a Wordpress or a Jabber case.
-
@marjoleink I think it makes it instantly clear what the software does. Compare: WordPress, SugarCRM.
-
@evan (1) The software is Wordpress, and wordpress.com is just one of many hosting options. Would you switch to identica.com and .org?
-
@evan (2) Wordpress isn't a community app. It really doesn't matter to visitors what blogging app you use. It's a back end convo.
-
@evan is there a reason why @ dont work over OMB when it works locally even tho both aint subbed to each other? This did work at some point?
-
@evan kinda defeats the purpose of federation if I have to log in locally to reply to a one-way- sub
-
@evan (3) You've said Identi.ca is for-profit, while Laconi.ca is open source. Folks talking FLOSS need never mention identica at the moment
-
@kshep I don't own either domain. We can easily put the software distribution under http://identi.ca/trac/ , /translate/, and /darcs/.
-
@evan I think WordPress (etc.) just confuses: you *always* have to ask people whether they are using the site or just the software
-
@kshep There's a lot of for-profit Open Source software -- again, WordPress and SugarCRM.
-
@evan FWIW, I understand the semantic difference, but its one of those pointless niggling ones that make mainstreamers confused and annoyed.
-
@evan Again, those aren't community apps with a network effect s.t. it matters what instance you're talking about.
-
@evan The company was named after the protocol, IIRC. It's still stifling competition. Nobody talks about OMB, yet.
-
@heygabe It bothers me having to describe the difference. I agree, it's confusing and annoying for no reason.
-
@evan you *will* have to describe the difference much more if they have the same name
-
A fork might not be a bad idea. You could continue to work on Identi.ca, @evan, and Laconica could become a more community based effort.
-
@kshep I believe most other instances right now have their own names.
-
@evan Indeed they do. Each Laconica instance has it's own name. Yours just happens to be Identica.
-
@kshep +1
-
@kshep You need to be pretty serious before threatening a fork, Ken. Better think about where you're going with this.
-
@kshep it doesn't have to be a fork - it's AGPL - any identica project code he writes has to be made available for pulling back into
-
@evan I'm not "threatening". I'm having a conversation in the open about the cons of you choosing to rename a comm project.
-
@metajack I would suggest it does - it's very straight forward language that says all customizations to a laconica site must be accessible
-
@kshep another data point: unanimous and enthusiastic support on laconica-dev: http://ur1.ca/7z3
-
@metajack now him being copyright holder doesn't prevent him from having dual license
-
@evan I've been following the laconica-dev convo, but the community members/users aren't participating in that convo.
-
@kshep liek there's a difference between Apple and iPhone
-
@evan: in this instance I think Identi.ca has stronger branding. Software equals strategy. Identity equals Identica. I back your approach.
-
@kshep what's the difference between name and branding? not disagreeing, just curious
-
@kshep But the brand isn't really the descision of the community, is it? Also, I doubt the majority of the users would care...
-
@kshep ...since the whole point of OMB *is* the fact that you can be brand-agnostic, right?
-
@evan I have to say I'm with @kshep on this. Identi.ca is a commercial instance of a OSS project, Laconica. Merging the names is confusing.
Evan Prodromou and Rob Loach like this. -
@metajack yes, agree - I was just being a license pendant for a second - what you said is a simpler version of what I said :)
-
@metajack So how are things going with your Jabber foundation?
-
@kshep I'm not saying I disagree with your preference. I disagree with the severity you assign it.
-
@bugabundo did you get my d message sent about an hour ago?
-
Identica wishlist: The ability to do a quickmix with a handful of users to create a 'conversation'. This time: @kshep @evan @metajack @dwd..
Evan Prodromou and Trent Olson like this. -
@bobthecow let's hashtag the conversation. #laconicaname
-
@bugabundo so we can send d msgs through XMPP but they need to be checked out from website? no thanks (for now) :)
-
@bobthecow @evan If I understand your idea correctly http://identi.ca/notice/741733 it's TERRIFFIC. My take: it's a "room on the fly" ??
-
@bear you knit! that's adoreable. I always worry how the knitters and the geeks will get along
-
@metajack very cool - I've always considered knitting as a more physical form of programming
-
@bear It does have a weird similarity to math and programming. I never did anything complicated though.
-
@metajack the west coast is like what, a 30 hour drive from the midwest? ;)
-
@tychoish a shame you just missed BarCampMilwaukee3 this past weekend :( Don't worry though, we have a plan for PodCampMilwaukee :)
-
Whoa, the @christopheradams clan has grown with addition of @mja ... cool :)
-
@metajack @bear #knitting I geek out on the intracate stuff http://www.tychoish.com/2007/12/casbah/ is the most impressive pictures I have
-
@bobthecow Quickmix: select a handful of subscribers to follow a specific conversation without reading the rest of your subscribers?
-
@bobthecow @rjeffries @evan How about something like http://identi.ca/bobthecow+rjeffries+evan+forteller to see the conversation between us?
-
@slidetone Something like that... @forteller suggested urls like this: http://tinyurl.com/3p4a78
-
@bobthecow Cool idea. I had the same idea few weeks ago. To select a small group of subscribers for a specific time.
-
@bobthecow It would make it easier to follow a conversation on one topic.
-