Identi.ca Identi.ca
  • Login
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular

Conversation

Notices

  1. Allison Randal Allison Randal

    Linux distros and foundations stand together on UEFI Secure Boot: http://bit.ly/vIb2Ih and http://bit.ly/ta9EF6

    Sunday, 30-Oct-11 14:10:00 UTC from web
    • bjavotte likes this.
    • Charles-H. Schulz and Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA repeated this.
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Free Software Foundation , The Linux Foundation

      @allisonrandal, your dent is misleading. !FSF opposes Restricted boot. Appears @linuxfoundation, #Canonical & #RedHat want it, but different

      Sunday, 30-Oct-11 20:20:05 UTC
    • Daniel Martí Daniel Martí Bradley M. Kuhn

      @bkuhn by that do you mean canonical, red hat, etc. are not with the fsf or that they are not that "extremist"?

      Sunday, 30-Oct-11 20:27:19 UTC
    • sazius (moved to status.saz.im) sazius (moved to status.saz.im) Free Software Foundation , Bradley M. Kuhn

      I was under the impression that the !FSF would accept "Secure Boot" if users could add their own keys or disable it.

      Sunday, 30-Oct-11 20:32:06 UTC
    • P. J. McDermott P. J. McDermott Free Software Foundation , Free Software , Bradley M. Kuhn , sazius (moved to status.saz.im)

      Yeah, !FSF urges that Secure Boot implementations allow !FS to be installed. (I haven't read LF's or Canonical's papers though.) /cc @bkuhn

      Sunday, 30-Oct-11 21:55:01 UTC
    • sazius (moved to status.saz.im) sazius (moved to status.saz.im) P. J. McDermott

      Yep, IMHO it could be a useful security feature as long as the computer owner/user has control over it.

      Sunday, 30-Oct-11 22:01:31 UTC
    • P. J. McDermott P. J. McDermott sazius (moved to status.saz.im)

      Yeah, I'd never heard of a bootkit before this issue, but I guess viruses in MS Windows have gotten so bad maybe people need Secure Boot. ;)

      Sunday, 30-Oct-11 22:07:04 UTC
    • sazius (moved to status.saz.im) sazius (moved to status.saz.im) P. J. McDermott

      Yeah, I'd be too scared to use a Windows machine these days :)

      Sunday, 30-Oct-11 22:15:34 UTC
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Free Software Foundation , P. J. McDermott

      IMO people tend to forget that there are various stages of boot. !FSF's position is that users should be able to replace BIOS w/ #coreboot

      Monday, 31-Oct-11 13:40:25 UTC
      Evan Prodromou and Moncler Jackets like this.
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn The Linux Foundation , Daniel Martí

      #Canonical, #Red_Hat, & @linuxfoundation seek a compromise which would keep BIOS proprietary but allow users to sign from there down.

      Monday, 31-Oct-11 13:41:32 UTC
    • x1101 x1101 Bradley M. Kuhn

      @bkuhn for that to be really practical tho, #coreboot would need to actually support hardware people own, not the other way round.

      Monday, 31-Oct-11 13:43:23 UTC
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn x1101

      @x1101, main problem is: if #UEFI is adopted in ways even Linux companies & Linux Foundation are suggesting, it'd make #coreboot impossible

      Monday, 31-Oct-11 14:16:28 UTC
    • x1101 x1101 Bradley M. Kuhn

      @bkuhn no disagreement. My point was, for #coreboot to be pratical, it needs to run on more hardware, so I can choose it after I buy smthng

      Monday, 31-Oct-11 14:19:28 UTC
      bjavotte likes this.
    • Alexandre Oliva Alexandre Oliva Free Software Foundation , Bradley M. Kuhn

      ♻ @bkuhn: there are various stages of boot. #FSF's position is that users should be able to replace BIOS w/ #coreboot

      Monday, 31-Oct-11 14:54:46 UTC
    • Daniel Martí Daniel Martí Bradley M. Kuhn

      @bkuhn So, they agree with non-free bios which would let the user decide which OS to use/install? Hmm...

      Monday, 31-Oct-11 16:14:17 UTC
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn Richard Fontana

      @fontana, I'm not sure I understand your question. Most computers have a BIOS, which is where #UEFI key management would be implemented.

      Wednesday, 02-Nov-11 12:54:55 UTC
    • Clacke Moved to Unlimited Clacke Moved to Unlimited Bradley M. Kuhn , Richard Fontana

      If I may hazard a guess, @fontana means that "BIOS" describes that of which UEFI is not an implementation, much like GNU is not Multics.

      Wednesday, 02-Nov-11 17:40:03 UTC
    • P. J. McDermott P. J. McDermott Bradley M. Kuhn

      @bkuhn, how would #UEFI with RH/Canonical & LF recommendations stop free firmware like #coreboot? Couldn't users just flash to ROM as usual?

      Wednesday, 09-Nov-11 06:44:52 UTC
    • P. J. McDermott P. J. McDermott Bradley M. Kuhn , P. J. McDermott

      @bkuhn, sorry for the late reply, but I'll be discussing UEFI at the NJIT ACM SIG GNU/Linux meetings this week & want to know your thoughts.

      Wednesday, 09-Nov-11 06:45:41 UTC
    • Bradley M. Kuhn Bradley M. Kuhn P. J. McDermott

      @pehjota, I believe I'll be speaking at NJIT on 2011-11-30. We can talk about #UEFI after my talk if you want. Too detailed for a talk topic

      Wednesday, 09-Nov-11 19:23:50 UTC
    • P. J. McDermott P. J. McDermott Bradley M. Kuhn

      Right, I was the one who contacted you re: 2011-11-30. But I'm leading 1-2 hrs of discussion on UEFI at SIG meetings starting this Friday.

      Wednesday, 09-Nov-11 19:58:26 UTC

Site notice

Identi.ca is converting to pump.io on 1 June 2013

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Identi.ca is a microblogging service brought to you by E14N. It runs the StatusNet microblogging software, version 1.1.0-release, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Identi.ca content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to mobile site layout.

Built in Montreal