Identi.ca Identi.ca
  • Login
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular

Conversation

Notices

  1. laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm CANADA , Canadian Politics

    rdr @dragosr Wearing a Guy Fawkes mask could get you 5 years in jail in !Canada, under new proposed bill C-309 http://ur1.ca/874ut !CDNpoli

    about 3 months ago from web
    • Kipngetich Ibrahim Ngeno and Jose R Rodriguez repeated this.
    • 1111aether 1111aether

      Oh dear :( ...This private members bill seems intended as an intimidation tactic/propoganda to disuade people from protesting.

      about 3 months ago
    • Brian van den Broek Brian van den Broek CANADA

      Well, it is only if wearing whilst commiting another offence. Still, makes me rething desire to come home. My country is broken.

      about 3 months ago
    • Dan Scott Dan Scott Brian van den Broek

      Combine this with the online surveillance bill (C30) and copyright legislation bill (C11) and I fear you're right. #pc_majority #bad_idea

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Canadian Politics , 1111aether

      @1111aether Bill-309 criminalizes mask wearing to suppress protest. If gov't decides a halloween party=riot mask w/get you 5 yrs !CDNpoli

      about 3 months ago
    • Guy Fawkes Guy Fawkes Dan Scott

      I know he's right.

      about 3 months ago
    • Mikael Mikael

      @laurelrusswurm if carrying a mask is illegal, then everybody must show and express there feelings and thoughts 100%. Immediately. :)

      about 3 months ago
    • Remote profile options...
      foonetic (lnxwalt) foonetic (lnxwalt)

      @laurelrusswurm @111aether I’m not #Canadian, but ISTM that rioting is already a crime. Banning masks during “riots” is not necessary.

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Canadian Politics , 1111aether

      @1111aether How do you know the street you are on will become a riot? Plenty of bystanders were swept into #G20 & assaulted by cops !CDNpoli

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Canadian Politics , 1111aether

      @1111aether and meanwhile, #G20 cops removed their badge #s with impunity. !CDNpoli

      about 3 months ago
    • Remote profile options...
      foonetic (lnxwalt) foonetic (lnxwalt) 1111aether

      @laurelrusswurm @1111aether I’m not #Canadian, but ISTM that rioting is already a crime. Banning masks during “riots” is not necessary.

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Canadian Politics , 1111aether

      @1111aether Masking will apply also to covering your face, so protecting yourself from teargas will get 5 years too !CDNpoli #G20report

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm CANADA , Canadian Politics , Brian van den Broek

      @vanden Ironic that you'd leave !Canada to enjoy better civil liberties in #Egypt !CDNpoli

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Mikael

      @inscius # C-309 "while wearing a mask or other disguise to conceal their identity without lawful excuse is guilty of an indictable offence"

      about 3 months ago
    • Brian van den Broek Brian van den Broek CANADA

      I wouldn't go quite that far. Canadian civilians are not routinely subject to military trials. Yet.

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm foonetic (lnxwalt)

      @lnxwalt Bill C-309 is called "Concealing Their Identity during Riots and Unlawful Assemblies Act" ... its"assemblies" they want to stop...

      about 3 months ago
    • Remote profile options...
      foonetic (lnxwalt) foonetic (lnxwalt)

      @laurelrusswurm But once they decide an assembly is unlawful, there are already legal remedies available, right?

      about 3 months ago
    • Brian van den Broek Brian van den Broek

      Not that I support the bill, but, from a scan, aren't all the mask provosions conditional on having committed a distinct crime while masked?

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Canadian Politics , foonetic (lnxwalt)

      @lnxwalt The government makes the rules, they get to define what constitutes a riot, what assemblies are unlawful. !CDNpoli #C-309

      about 3 months ago
    • Mikael Mikael

      @laurelrusswurm so burkas and large sunglasses would be offence...?

      about 3 months ago
    • Remote profile options...
      foonetic (lnxwalt) foonetic (lnxwalt) Brian van den Broek

      @vanden Perhaps I’m out of order commenting on your country’s politics, but doesn’t that mean mask law is unnecessary add-on penalty?

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Canadian Politics , Brian van den Broek

      @vanden Not conditional on crime, but on assembly. Masking your face at an unlawful assembly or riot. C-309 http://ur1.ca/874ut !CDNpoli

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Canadian Politics , Brian van den Broek

      @vanden Criminal code http://ur1.ca/87i8u states lawful assembly can become unlawful/riot, so peaceful protest will be suppressed. !CDNpoli

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm foonetic (lnxwalt)

      @lnxwalt If you are at a lawful assembly and someone yells at a cop, it can be upgraded to unlawful.

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Canadian Politics , Mikael

      @inscius Certainly. Covering your head with a hood, or your face with a collar. All these can conceal identity. #C-309 !CDNpoli

      about 3 months ago
    • Brian van den Broek Brian van den Broek foonetic (lnxwalt)

      Not out of order; I am happy to opine on yours :-) I took spirit to akin to additional penalties 4 using gun in commision of another crime.

      about 3 months ago
    • Mikael Mikael

      @laurelrusswurm but Canade is a cold climate country...? not like we don't have dumb and evil politicians here in Sweden. #globalcrap

      about 3 months ago
    • 1111aether 1111aether

      summary conviction is available

      about 3 months ago
    • Brian van den Broek Brian van den Broek

      "Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) while wearing a mask" makes it clear that mere mask-wearing not covered. It is >

      about 3 months ago
    • Brian van den Broek Brian van den Broek

      > still a bogus steaming piece of crap. But, mask offence language does require prior offence in order to apply.

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm CANADA , The Law Is An Ass , Brian van den Broek

      @vanden Nonetheless !Canada's civilians can be subjected to plenty of bad treatment indeed. #juklianichim !freebyron

      about 3 months ago
    • Brian van den Broek Brian van den Broek

      That doesn't worry. The language makes clear that "we originally assembled for a peacful purpose" no defence if purpose turned afterwards.

      about 3 months ago
    • Brian van den Broek Brian van den Broek CANADA

      We are very much on the same side, there. 'Yet' was included out of sarcasm and despair.

      about 3 months ago
    • Brian van den Broek Brian van den Broek

      Could you substantiate this claim, please? The language "will disturb the peace tumultuously" would not seem to cover yelling at a cop.

      about 3 months ago
    • 1111aether 1111aether

      There has only been 1 private members bill to ever pass since '86 (and that was to ban smoking in workplaces) and it's only been read....

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Canadian Politics , Brian van den Broek

      @vanden Except that attending an unlawful assembly or a riot *is* an offence under the criminal code. !CDNpoli #whykettlingallowed

      about 3 months ago
    • 1111aether 1111aether 1111aether

      ...& unlikely to get more support (c-309). It needn't pass to serve as propoganda though. Alberta troll is trollin :(

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm 1111aether

      @1111aether ah, but that was then; this is now, when our "law and order majority" are being challenged on #lawfulaccess #crimeomnibus &tc

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm CANADA , Brian van den Broek

      @vanden funny, it seems we should be on the same side

      about 3 months ago
    • Brian van den Broek Brian van den Broek

      My point was simply that you made it sound as though mere mask wearing in a gathering was being criminalized. As said, agree bill is crap.

      about 3 months ago
    • Brian van den Broek Brian van den Broek CANADA

      Low bandwidth medium; I don't really follow your meaning, here.

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm The Law Is An Ass , Brian van den Broek

      @vanden Taking photographs of police officers can and has resulted in criminal charges and incarceration. !freeByron

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Brian van den Broek

      @vanden Repression can and does happen because of overzealous interpretation of law.

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Canadian Politics , Brian van den Broek

      @vanden That the teen protesters were later released it doesn't mitigate the fact that they were subjected to strip search !CDNpoli

      about 3 months ago
    • 1111aether 1111aether

      Lots have been read. 86 is when the rules were changed concerning private members bills.Right now, it's just "some guy who's got a seat".

      about 3 months ago
    • Mikael Mikael

      @laurelrusswurm horrible. We had maybe something similar in Göteborg, Sweden, 2001 http://ur1.ca/87itm

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm 1111aether

      @1111aether It could very easily be voted for by majority in backlash for pushback..."Some guy" would get the backlash rather than the party

      about 3 months ago
    • 1111aether 1111aether

      A good backgrounder: http://ur1.ca/87iuw

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm 1111aether

      Thanks. I'll look at it later. (Have to get back to formatting now. :)

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm CANADA , Brian van den Broek

      I'm just tired of being attacked by you @vanden ... go troll somebody else.

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Mikael

      @inscius There is too much of it happening.

      about 3 months ago
    • Mikael Mikael

      @laurelrusswurm agree. A period of bigger changes. Hopefully it will come out better.

      about 3 months ago
    • 1111aether 1111aether

      He had me going for a bit too :( I have to go get ready myself(work at 4). don't think 'civic participation' will wash as a late excuse ;)

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm 1111aether

      @1111aether Get going ... and me too :)

      about 3 months ago
    • Brian van den Broek Brian van den Broek CANADA

      In all honesty, I cannot see anything trolling in this. I am open to possibility that I am wrong, but I have genuinely reflected.

      about 3 months ago
    • Brian van den Broek Brian van den Broek

      Agreed. That is a problem with enforcement and implementation. The best of laws can be bent by evil wills.

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm CANADA , Brian van den Broek

      @vanden You're not the first to dislike me, nor will you be the last. Just unfollow me and be done with it.

      about 3 months ago
    • Brian van den Broek Brian van den Broek CANADA

      Chill out. I've said nothing to indicate I harbour such attitudes. I was honestly attempting to engage in convo on topic of mutual interest.

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm CANADA , Brian van den Broek

      @vanden it happens in every conversation. Life is too short.

      about 3 months ago
    • nybill nybill Brian van den Broek

      @vanden @laurelrusswurm Yea, I've followed this exchange all day. I don't see where the animosity is. Come back tomorrow with fresh eyes. ;)

      about 3 months ago
    • Gordon Sinclair Gordon Sinclair nybill

      @nybill or let the puppy skim over it & wait for the malware writers to give their verdict #JudgeJudy styleeee

      about 3 months ago
    • Johnny Null Johnny Null Brian van den Broek

      @vanden Not to be a dick, but there's a reason I don't interact with laurelrusswurm.

      about 3 months ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm nybill

      @nybill Not just this, not this issue, everything UI say. I don't think Vanden's a troll to anyone but me. Personality clash. #suchislife

      about 3 months ago
    • 1111aether 1111aether Brian van den Broek

      Oh. In case its not obvious,by troll I meant the MP who presented a bill with no hope of pasing committee just to scare/distract activists

      about 3 months ago

Site notice

  • API
  • Status

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Identi.ca is a microblogging service brought to you by Status.net. It runs the StatusNet microblogging software, version 1.1.0-alpha1, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Identi.ca content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to mobile site layout.

Built in Montreal