Conversation
Notices
-
"Network Services Aren't Free or Nonfree; They Raise Other Issues" -- http://ur1.ca/90ylx -- !fsf !gnu !autonomous -- New article by @rms
- Rob Myers, Matt Lee and Free Software Foundation and 11 others like this.
- herath72, Tomás Solar Castro and Matt Lee and 9 others repeated this.
-
lost me at "the implementation is not visible to users of the service, so it has no direct effect on them"
-
SaaS is Stallman's http://identi.ca/url/68993703 - Just because a service may substitute for s/w, that doesn't make it the same.
-
'free' is ethically unsound when extended beyond "freedoms suspended by #copyright & #patent", e.g. into those precluded by #privacy.
Mike Linksvayer likes this. -
The 'ND writing' thing simply comes from a failure to grok the difference between creating a derivative work and misrepresentation/misattrib
Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) likes this. -
@crosbie That's a pretty big failure to grok.
-
'Free' is perfectly ethical when it comes to speech. Services requiring humans to cede our freedom to software are not ethically sound.
-
@crosbie that's particularly funny given ex given of "services that are implemented by asking human beings to enter responses to questions"
-
"felicitate" is a verb? geeeeez
Mike Linksvayer likes this. -
@pfctdayelise I felicitate you on your use of antique english...
-
@mlinksva I thought it may amuse you. Tilting at services is tilting at windmills. They're just mechanisms. They don't suck out our freedom.