Identi.ca Identi.ca
  • Login
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular

Conversation

Notices

  1. Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Libertarians , Greg Grossmeier

    I am Barack Obama http://imgur.com/y0BlO #election2012 !libertarian - Also @greg just to start my day on a trollish note :)

    about a year ago from web
    • Remote profile options...
      Stephen o Esteban Stephen o Esteban

      /me is curious on how Ron Paul is also not the establishment since he is employed by the establishment :) ~trollish

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Stephen o Esteban

      We're all employed by the establishment.

      about a year ago
    • Greg Grossmeier Greg Grossmeier Libertarians

      @pete honest question that may be inappropriate at this time: Obama or Romney?

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Libertarians , Greg Grossmeier

      The liquor store.

      about a year ago
    • Greg Grossmeier Greg Grossmeier Libertarians

      @pete good answer. (sidenote: I was honestly surprised that my phone knew/predicted Obama and Romney)

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Libertarians , Greg Grossmeier

      The serious answer is Ron Paul. Really, @greg, we've known each other kind of a long time now. Am I a "lesser of two evils" guy?

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Libertarians , Greg Grossmeier

      Heh. Try to type Ron Paul in there, see if turns into Romney ;)

      about a year ago
      Greg Grossmeier likes this.
    • Remote profile options...
      Stephen o Esteban Stephen o Esteban

      that's a bit of a generalization being that Ron Paul actively participates in a political system puts the privileged fi…

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Stephen o Esteban

      So anyone involved in politics is unqualified to be involved in politics? I see a few problems with this.

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Stephen o Esteban

      Do you intend to vote? Just curious.

      about a year ago
    • Greg Grossmeier Greg Grossmeier Libertarians

      @pete my real question is: do you see much of a real difference between Obama and Romney? 6 vs half a dozen?

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Libertarians , Greg Grossmeier

      Only in whose pockets they will pick and whose pockets they will fill. Obama will fatten unions, the auto industry, and Wall Street...

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Libertarians , Greg Grossmeier

      Romney will fatten oil companies, defense contractors, and Wall Street.

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Libertarians , Greg Grossmeier

      They will both fuck the working poor. Obama will especially fuck the non-union working poor. Romney the union working poor.

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Libertarians , Greg Grossmeier

      They will both blow up brown people in mud huts and not call it a war. Why are you doing this to me, @greg? Now I want a drink ;)

      about a year ago
      Greg Grossmeier likes this.
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Libertarians , Greg Grossmeier

      Let me edit that. Romney will fuck organized labor, Obama will fuck disorganized labor. Yeah, I like that better. Sorry for the dent-bomb.

      about a year ago
    • Remote profile options...
      Stephen o Esteban Stephen o Esteban

      no but someone within a party claiming to be outside the established system while working in the system that he says he…

      about a year ago
    • Remote profile options...
      Stephen o Esteban Stephen o Esteban

      rather spend my time building a new system to replace the joke of the US system...it was never intended for the people

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Stephen o Esteban

      I don't think that's a fair representation at all. We're also trying to rebuild the system, we're just using a different tactic.

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Stephen o Esteban

      Ron Paul's about as "outside the system" as one who works in DC can be. I don't see how one could claim otherwise.

      about a year ago
    • Remote profile options...
      Stephen o Esteban Stephen o Esteban

      my point is trying to change system from within the system is pointless as it has been tried and failed...the system won't allow it

      about a year ago
    • Remote profile options...
      Stephen o Esteban Stephen o Esteban

      But he is in DC and validates the government and means to change from within...what's the point of doing that?

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Stephen o Esteban

      You don't think, for instance, FDR changed the system from within? Or, to take a counter-example, Reagan? I totally disagree.

      about a year ago
    • Remote profile options...
      Stephen o Esteban Stephen o Esteban

      Um i don't think of FDR as a great person and certainly not Reagan either, i mean if you want to protect the capitalist…

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Stephen o Esteban

      I didn't say they were great people, I said achieved change. Whether it's change you or I like is not the point.

      about a year ago
    • Remote profile options...
      Stephen o Esteban Stephen o Esteban

      we are putting a low bar on change here...don't you think...i mean if saving capitalism from it's own internal conflict…

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Stephen o Esteban

      If you're calling anything short of socialist revolution "not really change," then this is rigged and we can't have an honest conversation.

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Stephen o Esteban

      If the New Deal doesn't count as change, you are just blinded by your ideology. Not trying to be mean, but damn, dude.

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Stephen o Esteban

      Just as a datapoint, when I referred to Reagan I was thinking about his foreign policy. Disgusting, abhorrent, but a marked change.

      about a year ago
    • Remote profile options...
      Stephen o Esteban Stephen o Esteban

      I am not saying it has to be socialist but change does imply that those in power are no longer in power and that didn't…

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Stephen o Esteban

      You keep saying it, "it it doesn't bring down the capitalist system it's not really change." (Paraphrased.) You are rigging the game.

      about a year ago
    • Remote profile options...
      Stephen o Esteban Stephen o Esteban

      All that was in the New Deal was response to the movements on the ground to stop them cause they were seeking revolutio…

      about a year ago
    • Remote profile options...
      Stephen o Esteban Stephen o Esteban

      which part of his foreign policy the CIA intervention in countries with socialist uprisings like Guatemala that was so …

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Stephen o Esteban

      So if it's not the fall of capitalism, it's not change. I can't have a debate with you on those premises, I just can't.

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Stephen o Esteban

      It was a change in scope and scale. It made multiple hot, undeclared wars the new normal.

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Stephen o Esteban

      Which isn't to say that it's never happened before. But it's never stopped since.

      about a year ago
    • Pete Daniels Pete Daniels Stephen o Esteban

      And the other reason I can't continue to debate you...I'm going home :) Catch up with you later!

      about a year ago
    • Remote profile options...
      Stephen o Esteban Stephen o Esteban

      I am open to changing the constitution or actual systemic change to the government but no actual changes were made to t…

      about a year ago
    • Remote profile options...
      Stephen o Esteban Stephen o Esteban

      But Reagan didn't create that as my point was that the CIA was already doing this before vietnam and after under nixon,…

      about a year ago

Site notice

Identi.ca is converting to pump.io on 1 June 2013

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Identi.ca is a microblogging service brought to you by E14N. It runs the StatusNet microblogging software, version 1.1.0-release, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Identi.ca content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to mobile site layout.

Built in Montreal