Identi.ca Identi.ca
  • Login
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular

Conversation

Notices

  1. laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm

    @1111aether thank you :)

    about a year ago from web
    • Gordon Sinclair Gordon Sinclair

      @1111aether security staff unlawfully demanding access to stuff like that should be a sackable offence; same with deletion of photos etc

      about a year ago
    • Gordon Sinclair Gordon Sinclair

      @1111aether with security companies, I'd also blacklist them so they can't just pop up at the same bar with a different contractor

      about a year ago
    • Gordon Sinclair Gordon Sinclair

      @1111aether if it's age verification, better to demand they sign into a pay porn site, than #Facebook that everyone underage lies about

      about a year ago
    • Gordon Sinclair Gordon Sinclair

      @1111aether over 18, check.....whats this? critical of this bar? sorry, can't come in, our lawyers will be in touch with a DMCA

      about a year ago
    • zoowar zoowar

      However, anonymity enables us to partition our public lives and choose who we share which partitions with.

      about a year ago
    • zoowar zoowar Gordon Sinclair

      Neither are valid forms of identification.

      about a year ago
    • Gordon Sinclair Gordon Sinclair zoowar

      @zoowar I know, but bouncers seem not to

      about a year ago
    • Gordon Sinclair Gordon Sinclair zoowar

      @zoowar at least a pay site means yer old enough to have a credit card; which by extension assumes yer old enough to get in

      about a year ago
    • zoowar zoowar

      I may or may not have a fb account. If i do, the account is 'anon' wrt you until such a time that you become aware of the account.

      about a year ago
    • Gordon Sinclair Gordon Sinclair

      @1111aether the #FBI like to think of themselves as #Anonymous - maybe they can foil their own lulz attacks

      about a year ago
    • zoowar zoowar Gordon Sinclair

      In the US, the min credit card age is 18, but the drinking age is 21.

      about a year ago
    • zoowar zoowar

      That's the core issue with privacy. Once something is shared, we no longer have control over it's privacy status.

      about a year ago
    • Gordon Sinclair Gordon Sinclair

      @1111aether change the name legally to God, then answer "I don't have Facebook, I am Facebook, I am everything & everyone" ;)

      about a year ago
    • Gordon Sinclair Gordon Sinclair

      @1111aether then cover the bases with a wave of the hand #JediMindTrick style "this is not the Facebook account you're looking for"

      about a year ago
    • zoowar zoowar zoowar

      What concerns me is that surveillance culture takes this basic human property away from us.

      about a year ago
    • Gordon Sinclair Gordon Sinclair

      @1111aether yeah they do seem to have a habit of always doing increasingly creepy & controlling things like this

      about a year ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm

      @1111aether In the past I've annoyed family insisting they untag me, but lately I've had Facebook notices asking if tagging me is OK

      about a year ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Privacy

      @1111aether the UK is ahead of us in some !privacy issues ... I wouldn't doubt it happens here... border guards Google people

      about a year ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm

      @1111aether The lady in the article is a pretty blonde; i doubt its ID verification as much as "check out the chick" bs

      about a year ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Gordon Sinclair

      @thistleweb @1111aether It doesn't matter how pathetic Facebook privacy actually is; it does have a wall around it. None of their business.

      about a year ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Privacy , Gordon Sinclair

      @thistleweb @1111aether Your phone is private. They don't have the right to look inside your wallet either !privacy http://www.ur1.ca/96f8a

      about a year ago
    • Remote profile options...
      Kevin Granade Kevin Granade

      @1111aether same here, I created an account in order to un-tag myself in photos, one of the many aspects of FB's abusiv…

      about a year ago
    • zoowar zoowar

      Alternate perspective http://ur1.ca/96l8q

      about a year ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm

      @1111aether I don't know what "topped my phone" means

      about a year ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm

      @1111aether maybe I'm old fashioned, but... "standard pat down" ? WTF ? This is supposed to be *fun* ? Not worth it.

      about a year ago
    • zoowar zoowar

      Sometime we don't know or think about what we want until we need it. There is a normative expectation of privacy that fb doesn't live up to.

      about a year ago
    • zoowar zoowar

      I did preface it with 'alternate perspective' and only posted it because it was timely.

      about a year ago
    • Coyo Stormbringer Coyo Stormbringer

      people saying "Facebook is private"??

      about a year ago
    • zoowar zoowar

      The unthinking mob rules ::(

      about a year ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm

      @1111aether Whether she is or not isn't the issue; This is an invasion of privacy that is unwarranted (excuse the pun) and unjustified.

      about a year ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Privacy

      @1111aether having a stranger romp through your phone or your purse is no less invasive than facebook's !privacy infringements

      about a year ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Privacy

      @1111aether As little as 20 years ago it would have been inconceivable to search the audience as part of the price of admission !privacy

      about a year ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Jan Wildeboer

      @1111aether My point: both instances of privacy erosions that I find unacceptable. Did you see @jwildeboer had to show passport to buy gas?

      about a year ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm

      @1111aether I consider the contents of my pockets or purse to be private; and facebook should afford some privacy

      about a year ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Privacy

      @1111aether Charter protects us from unwarranted search & seizure by gov't; seems we need something to protect us from corporations !privacy

      about a year ago
    • Kete Foy Kete Foy Privacy

      @laurelrusswurm The protection is probably "don't attend the club" or whatever the case was.

      about a year ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm

      @1111aether I understand; you're providing me with information. Erosion of rights often come in tiny increments so as not to seem so bad

      about a year ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm Privacy , Kete Foy

      @kete Yes. Like #CISPA and #C30 will make it "don't go on the internet if you don't want to be spied on"

      about a year ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm zoowar

      @zoowar The Facebook Fallacy http://ur1.ca/96l8q a really good article, thanks for sharing it.

      about a year ago
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm

      @1111aether You may be, but it is a big place. Insight is necessary for understanding.

      about a year ago

Site notice

Identi.ca is converting to pump.io on 1 June 2013

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Identi.ca is a microblogging service brought to you by E14N. It runs the StatusNet microblogging software, version 1.1.0-release, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Identi.ca content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to mobile site layout.

Built in Montreal