Conversation
Notices
-
!FaiFCast 0x35: @bkuhn & @kaz discuss the !Oracle vs. !Google #copyright decision & how it doesn't impact !GPL nor !copyleft. ur1.ca/bulrg
- Gustavo Vega likes this.
- Gustavo Vega repeated this.
-
@methoddan does another great !FaiFCast editing job & #OSUOSL does a great job with the bandwidth. Please Donate to them! osuosl.org/donate
-
I'm glad you explicitly say in the title it doesn't rather than "DOES the oracle v google decision impact GPL/copyleft? News at 11!"
-
I don't think I caught even one use of "folks" on this #FaiF episode. Thank you for listening to your listener community! !notatroll
Evan Prodromou likes this. -
@faif Loved this new episode~! Always happy to have something to listen to while walking~
-
I finally wrote my "nothing to see here; move along" blog post about the !Oracle v. !Google #copyright decision. http://ur1.ca/by0m7
Hilton Garcia Fernandes likes this. -
@fontana, your ego is getting the better of you. I don't think of you ever time I use the word folks, which I've used since the early 1990s.
-
@bkuhn "always have been" is a slight exaggeration.
-
@bkuhn I think there's been a long history in computing around the copyrightability of languages and APIs. Not prima facie ridiculous.
-
@evan examples? The closest example I can think of is the FAT name-mangling scheme, and that's a patent, not a ©.
-
Saying that API copyrights are ridiculous because, hey, #Wine implements a non-standard API, is very weak proof.
-
Many of the "copycat" APIs that we are used to, like POSIX, are actually made available under some standards regime.
-
#StatusNet implement a work-alike API created for Twitter; this has always been something that concerns me.
-
Lotus vs. Borland. http://identi.ca/url/74505828.
-
Ashton-Tate vs. Fox Software. http://identi.ca/url/74505847
-
SAS vs WPS http://identi.ca/url/74505888
-
@evan 1. It regards menu layout, which is API-like at best (though similar legal theories apply) 2. It was held un-©-able.
-
To a very large extent, the success of Free and Open Source software has depended on our ability to make work-alike software.
-
@evan The summary sounds like they copied the entire UI instead of just the portions necessary for programmatic access.
-
@evan Doesn't this argument amount to "some people argue for it" similar to flat-earth "theories"?
-
@x1101 IMO "X is derivative, not innovative" is a myth, all innovation is incremental.
-
@x1101 I think that's important. I think it'd be dishonest to say that work-alike clones haven't been important for FLOSS.
Christopher Allan Webber likes this. -
@kevingranade I don't think this line of reasoning is as far outside the mainstream as flat-earth theories are.
-
The macro language was a key part of the case.
-
...and the fact that we've had 2 very court cases about the subject in the last few years suggests it's non-obvious.
-
@evan It's not AS absurd, but it's still absurd. The argument is fallacious.
-
@evan To the extent that the cases are similar, it was rejected, I don't see how that supports the argument being credible.
-
You're wrong. Copyright on APIs, file formats, network protocols, and programming languages have been a real issue for a while.
-
@evan that doesn't follow, to avoid outright dismissal, a case only needs some valid issues, not necessaraly the one we're discussing.
-
@bkuhn, when speaking of Free Software re-implementations, I think you are mistaken in equating "not copyrightable" with non-infringing.
-
@bkuhn The Twitter and StatusNet APIs are diverging a wee bit. See Debian bug 693147 that I filed as a blocker as ttytter has to have
-
@bkuhn things rebuilt to handle Twitter 1.1 compared to the StatusNet API's shift to AtomPub...
-
@bkuhn, APIs could inhere copyright protection and non-infringing uses be allowed owing to scenes a faire, estoppel, and copyright misuse.
-
Twitter folks have said something along that line, see http://identi.ca/url/74522447
-
@evan Well, it is diverging now I guess. Is there a StatusNet equivalent to Cards or are the two APIs becoming different?
-
#notatroll ?
-
@fontana rule 1 of fixing the PHP problem: don't talk about PHP
-
@saul,I'm still confused,since the whole point was the Court held that APIs in themselves aren't ©'able, only the implementations are ©'able
-
@bkuhn, the court (J. Wm Alsup) did not rule that APIs are not copyrightable. I will send an email elaborating my position.