Sam Black at
'Independent' gov law reviewer wants users preemptively identified before they're 'allowed' to use encryption
UK watchdog echoes Home Sec in anti-crypto comments
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/09/01/max_hill_qc_deny_encryption_anonymous_users/
Yea, as identity theft isn't a thing, captchas are foolproof, and verification is quick; did this QC just ignore the tech companies replies, or has he "had enough of experts"?
Is there no one in the UK Government who gets technology? Or is willing to acknowledge they don't understand it and need assistance?
UK watchdog echoes Home Sec in anti-crypto comments
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/09/01/max_hill_qc_deny_encryption_anonymous_users/
Yea, as identity theft isn't a thing, captchas are foolproof, and verification is quick; did this QC just ignore the tech companies replies, or has he "had enough of experts"?
Is there no one in the UK Government who gets technology? Or is willing to acknowledge they don't understand it and need assistance?
» Sam Black:
“[...] Is there no one in the UK Government who gets technology? [...]”
Nope.
It's the same around here. Welcome to governments xD
JanKusanagi at 2017-09-01T17:18:34Z
Tom Tishken likes this.