2013-02-28T00:24:19+00:00 via web To: a(n) person, Public
Hi.2013-02-08T16:15:21+00:00 via web To: Public
New "People Are Awesome" was posted http://ur1.ca/cqnqi Well worth checking out.2012-12-05T02:29:55+00:00 via web To: Public
It strikes me that deletion of identity and assertion of identity is similar to indistinguishability: http://ur1.ca/bucwz2012-12-05T02:14:46+00:00 via web To: Public
Deleting identity, we're arguing that logical inference neither depends nor is non-separable from identity; thus, separable or independent.2012-12-05T02:11:42+00:00 via web To: Public
Assuming identity, we're arguing that logical inference depends or is non-separable from identity. Thus, Zizzi can define entanglement.2012-12-05T02:07:06+00:00 via web To: Public
As entanglement is defined by the nonseparability of the state of two or more systems. IE identity and logical existence.2012-12-05T02:05:29+00:00 via web To: Public
If there is an equivalence relationship between dependence & separability then entanglement reflects identity's existence.2012-12-05T01:57:38+00:00 via web To: Public
On a related note, is independence and dependence equivalent or identical to separability and nonseparability?2012-12-05T01:54:42+00:00 via web To: Public
Likewise, if I stand at the root of classical reasoning and seek to claim identity's existence, am I not arguing its dependence?2012-12-05T01:53:38+00:00 via web To: Public
If I stand at the root of classical reasoning and seek to claim identity's nonexistence, am I not arguing its independence?2012-12-05T01:50:42+00:00 via web To: Public
The concepts of logical independence and dependence would seem to me linked to an argument of non-identity.2012-11-11T00:47:23+00:00 via web To: Public
Following the path of this particular wandering time traveller, we find it loops through the operator's perspective. http://ur1.ca/avppm2012-11-11T00:27:00+00:00 via web To: Public
For a familiar frame of reference, the operator--who does not get into the Time Machine--has a flat path. http://ur1.ca/avpnf2012-11-11T00:15:14+00:00 via web To: Public
Closed loop time travel. The Time Machine turns on and immediately turns off from the TM's perspective. http://ur1.ca/avpm52012-11-11T01:11:18+00:00 via web To: Public
The Wander's perspective is pseudo-linear. Entering the machine at the 3rd activation & exiting at the 1st activation. http://ur1.ca/avps12012-09-23T15:20:40+00:00 via web To: Public
I need more philosophical questions for this survey: http://ur1.ca/ae92u2012-09-23T03:19:06+00:00 via web To: Public
This is a poor version of a "what's your philosophy quiz": http://ur1.ca/ae3bd2012-04-15T12:26:47+00:00 in Chico, California, United States via web To: Public
By the way, "Hi!" Zey. I hope you're doing well.2012-04-15T12:17:06+00:00 in Chico, California, United States via web To: Public
I don't recall the last time I updated my status here with what I've been doing at the blog (not a lot) http://ur1.ca/90cfaRuset Zeno, Ruset Zeno shared this.
2012-04-15T12:14:06+00:00 in Chico, California, United States via web To: Public
Original conversations and document: http://ur1.ca/90cep http://ur1.ca/90cer #philosophy #logic #reason #scienceRuset Zeno, Ruset Zeno shared this.