P. J. McDermott (pehjota)

P. J. McDermott warp

Seriously though, I'd suggest something like an "X-Source" header to point to the complete corresponding source code.

P. J. McDermott GNU Affero General Public Licence , warp

HTTP/1.1 considered incompatible with !AGPLv3. #notatroll

P. J. McDermott Free Software , busybox

The best warranty disclaimer I've ever seen is that of the !BusyBox Web site: http://ur1.ca/7qplc !FS

P. J. McDermott

Chris Dodd (MPAA CEO): Artists are poor, so we need more power. http://ur1.ca/7mow1 !EFF !FC #SOPA #PIPA

P. J. McDermott siddharth

@ rsiddharth It's just that many hackers (myself included) have beards. ;)

P. J. McDermott siddharth

@rsiddharth Nah, obviously the love of tinkering, exploration, and sharing information is more important than appearances are.

P. J. McDermott Sudaraka Wijesinghe

@sudaraka The Tux drawings are of course copyrighted; no trademark AFAIK. Details/license: http://ur1.ca/7i454

P. J. McDermott Matt Lee

@mattl How can you call yourself a hacker with a clean shaven face? :P Also, nice cat.

P. J. McDermott Matt Lee

@mattl The lighting effect behind you is pretty cool. Also, a bigger laptop computer would allow you to place more stickers.

P. J. McDermott Bradley M. Kuhn

@bkuhn I don't like that we aren't told what goes in our bodies. But ∃ laws (FDA) to protect consumers, & rev. engineering isn't forbidden.

P. J. McDermott Free Software , Bradley M. Kuhn

@bkuhn "dirty licenses" sounds funny since a license gives rights to do things. Similarly: http://ur1.ca/7hgjc

P. J. McDermott Free Software , Bradley M. Kuhn , Richard Fontana

@fontana I think @bkuhn means that technically "no license == public domain" is wrong. No license == no rights to use a copyrighted work.

P. J. McDermott mray , P. J. McDermott

@mray Additionally, the ability of users to "fork" the repository on GitHub and the existing 75 such forks make for an estoppel.

P. J. McDermott mray , Richard Fontana , P. J. McDermott

@mray Though as @fontana notes, context (parenthetical and GitHub hosting) suggests an intended all-permissive license.

P. J. McDermott mray

Arguably all rights reserved, I'd say. Before dealing in the sw I'd contact the © holder to teach him how © law works and what a license is.

P. J. McDermott Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo

@cascardo Yes, or sometimes just "legally-denied". E.g. you can't drive on gov't-owned roads or carry firearms in most places w/o a license.

P. J. McDermott Free Software

Why are contracts to use non !FS called "EULAs"? Licenses give rights; End User Contracts take away otherwise legally-protected rights.

P. J. McDermott Free Software , Richard Fontana

@fontana Obviously, since a license is permission to do something, that description of non-copyrighted works sounds strange and incorrect.

P. J. McDermott Bradley M. Kuhn , mray , Richard Fontana

@mray I assume this is the license to which you're referring: http://ur1.ca/7fntz /cc @bkuhn @fontana

P. J. McDermott Debian , Harley Laue

Yes, I will be using opkg to manage binary pkgs. I'm just trying to determine best way to build multiple/split binary pkgs from source pkgs.