Iñaki Arenaza

Lauren Weinstein: Why Governments Lie About Encryption Backdoors

Iñaki Arenaza at

A little gem from Lauren Weinstein's blog, via lwn.net:

"They know that the smart, major terrorist groups will never use systems with government-mandated backdoors for their important communications, they'll continue to use strong systems developed in and/or distributed by countries without such government mandates, or their own strong self-designed apps.

So it seems clear that the real reason for the government push for encryption backdoors is an attempt not to catch the most dangerous terrorists that they're constantly talking about, but rather a selection of "low-hanging fruit" of various sorts.

Inept would-be low-level terrorists. Drug dealers. Prostitution rings. Free speech advocates and other political dissidents. You know the types.

That is, just about everybody EXCEPT the most dangerous terrorist groups that wouldn't go near backdoored encryption systems with a ten foot pole, yet are the very groups governments are loudly claiming backdoor systems are required to fight.


Encryption backdoors are a gleeful win-win for terrorists and a horrific lose-lose for you, me, our families, our friends, and for other law-abiding persons everywhere. Backdoors would result in the worst of the bad guys having strong protections for their data, and the rest of us being hung out to dry."

EricxDu likes this.

Jose Luis Perez Diez, Javier Cantero, Javier Cantero, Javier Cantero shared this.

Basically, "war on terror" is an excuse for every terrible thing they may wish to do, now or in the future.

JanKusanagi @i at 2015-12-18T14:19:26Z