Alexandre Oliva (lxoliva)
-
@mairin if not, this is something that Fedora should document, for it's Fedora's packaging decision out of a single gnash upstream tarball
-
@mairin do maintainers of the gnash web site have any relationship with the gnash packagers in Fedora?
-
!linuxlibre 3.2.6-libre-lemote, 3.0.21-libre-lemote, 2.6.32.57-libre2-lemote and 2.6.27.61-libre5-lemote debs for !gnewsense !yeeloong out
-
@glynmoody so it's intermediaries vs intermediaries, eh?
-
♻ @glynmoody: #TPP: Welcome to the global war on intermediaries - http://bit.ly/zxCSek teh best quick summary of why this is so bad
-
I can't see the weather forecast on TV because the satellite signal is jammed by a thunderstorm #ohtheirony
-
@evan how about edible blobs, do you like them?
-
@bkuhn I use svnwiki to compile my blog to html, and the marked-up sources remain available, but... binary blogs?!? :-)
-
@bkuhn how did you guess? :-) why, of course they're unethical, they're non-Free Software! :-)
-
@kevingranade Sri Lanka must have annexed Brazil, US, and the rest of the world recently. WWUSSL or something ;-)
-
@glynmoody and some gave me odd looks when I referred to “publishing industries” to covermovie, music, sw and book publishers...
-
@metztli the C∈B is entirely your own groundless speculation. nothing in GPL requires distributor to offer the sw to co-contributors
-
@metztli while sending code back upstream is regarded as contributing, sending it only downstream is more like forking
-
@metztli A's contribution to B happens when A gives code to B, not to a third party C
-
@bkuhn IOW (MSNBC/MSBBC headline for this): Jon Corbet says Linux is going to die ;-)
-
@metztli if you *choose* to distribute your changes to others in binary form, you need only provide *them* with sources != contribute
-
@metztli FUD! you're free to keep your changes to yourself, that's GPL compliant.
-
@mairin did you try yum install gnash-plugin ?
-
♻ @gnutek: #Linux-libre 3.2.6 .deb Now available at #FSFLA & #FSC + receipe update on #Libreplanet