Tasty, tasty s-expressions.
Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) likes this.
NOTE This is not meant to be offensive. It's just an important and personal note.
My worry with WebAssembly is that it won't change the "non-free software automatically being used" scenario.
There was an issue openned against WebAssembly, but it was closed due to inactivity: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/1011.
Accordingo to Stallman, fostering WebAssembly as it is now doesn't change the already existing problems regarding software freedom, see https://media.libreplanet.org/u/libreplanet/m/free-software-awards-with-richard-stallman-awards-presentation-and-speech/.
It won't change that problem, and I'm not expecting it to.
But, if I had the option to compile something like Guile from scheme -> webassembly, I could use the same templates in both, and I wouldn't be tempted to go executable-browser-only for my templating.