joeyh

joeyh at

Sitting here looking at https://micahflee.com/2013/11/canonical-shouldnt-abuse-trademark-law-to-silence-critics-of-its-priva... and also at a grep `Ubuntu -r .` in certain source trees with 3000+ hits. 

Remember *nix, Canonical?

netgeek, Tom Marble, Mike Linksvayer, Christopher Allan Webber likes this.

Artopal, Stefano Zacchiroli, mray INACTIVE shared this.

Show all 9 replies
Excellent!!!  The "derivative which must not be named!"


Tom Marble at 2013-11-08T17:10:56Z

@joeyh, while your joke-patch is funny, I hope you realize that kowtowing to Canonical, Ltd. on this gives them what they want.

Also, they presumably have Canonical trademarked too -- which is getting to my point about their cooption of common words.

Bradley M. Kuhn at 2013-11-08T17:22:32Z

@bkuhn It's giving them what they asked for in a sense, but not what they want... @joeyh is turning canonical's actions into worse PR for them, and I think that's a "I regret getting what I asked for" moment.

Christopher Allan Webber at 2013-11-08T17:49:21Z

X11R5, j1mc, joeyh likes this.

@bkuhn, If Canonical is trademarked, then "Mark Shuttleworth's Debian Derivative" seems like a good alias name for Debian Derivative by Canonical that cannot be named.

rsd at 2013-11-09T05:54:43Z