@samwwwblack@identi.ca but then they're breaking the "no further restrictions" clause of the GPL putting themselves back in copyright infringement territory. Seems the GPL licensed binaries are safe, but leaves a sour taste about anything Canonical related.
Sure, but if you're running an organisation that distributes Ubuntu somewhere, would you run the risk of being sued?
The point of the policy is to create enough uncertainty that people go ask Canonical, meaning Canonical can charge money; they gotta make a profit at some point.
The point of the policy is to create enough uncertainty that people go ask Canonical, meaning Canonical can charge money; they gotta make a profit at some point.