T&C
Let's be blunt: the three lines in this footer from the Fedora wiki are in direct opposition to one another.
Why would anyone contribute to a wiki where a commercial company claims copyright and "all rights reserved" over that person's contribution?
Why would anyone contribute to a wiki where a commercial company claims copyright and "all rights reserved" over that person's contribution?
Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠), lnxwalt@microca.st likes this.
jrobertson, jrobertson, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠), Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) shared this.
Show all 9 replies
@jankusanagi In this case, no. Right-click? Sure, but the browser thinks you want to do something with the text because the image is so small that the post text completely covers every pixel of the image that you can't right-click on the actual image itself...
>> Jason Self:
“@jankusanagi In this case, no.”
Ok, in that case, let's just...
https://identi.ca/uploads/n8/2016/6/21/BDPB-w.png
JanKusanagi @identi.ca at 2016-08-04T12:26:30Z
Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) likes this.
@Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) He may have; I wouldn't be surprised but I haven't heard. He does, definitely, get the credit for moving RH away from contributor license agreements.
It's unfortunate, though, that immediately after that change (when heretofore RH had enthusiastically loved its CLAs), the RH PR machine started turning "CLAs are evil" into a club used to take swipes at Canonical. I find that sort of disingenuity extremely off-putting.
It's unfortunate, though, that immediately after that change (when heretofore RH had enthusiastically loved its CLAs), the RH PR machine started turning "CLAs are evil" into a club used to take swipes at Canonical. I find that sort of disingenuity extremely off-putting.
Nathan Willis at 2016-08-04T13:47:14Z
Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) likes this.
The "easiest" way for me to view the image was actually to bring up the Web Console, click the lightbox with the Inspector, and remove the caption element from the DOM. :-O