Susan Pinochet

Atlanta, United States

avid computer user, former programmer, lover of good design, armchair philosopher, lesbian homemaker

  • at 2015-11-20T20:23:41Z

    Am I the only person who puts his finger too close to the scroll bar on android and becomes horribly annoyed?

    Susan Pinochet likes this.

    no you are not

    lostson at 2015-11-20T20:29:14Z

    You are definitely not alone. Wifh Andstatus would allow setting what side the scroll bar is on

    Freemor at 2015-11-20T20:52:03Z likes this.

  • Avadiax at 2015-11-21T00:21:41Z

    ISIL's professionally done TIME-like magazines explain why their way is the right way ...

    Susan Pinochet likes this.

  • flow

    joeyh at 2015-11-21T01:51:37Z

    The spring ran dry 4 months ago, and finally started flowing this week. The cistern is full, hurrah! Was down to ~1 month water.

    Susan Pinochet, Charles Stanhope, Greg Grossmeier likes this.

  • Elena ``of Valhalla'' at 2015-11-17T12:35:13Z

    Decoding Daesh: Why is the new name for ISIS so hard to understand? | Free Word Centre
    Arabic translator Alice Guthrie explains how Daesh, the new name for ISIS, undermines the terrorist group, and asks why anglophone media can't understand it.

    sazius at, Susan Pinochet, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) likes this.

    Adam Moore (LÆMEUR), Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠), Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) shared this.

    Best comment:

    I wonder why you avoided the better slang term (in the US) for jerks that try to impose their will on others: Douchebag or just douche. Sounds a lot like the arabic daish and is anything but complementary. Thanks for the excellent article.

    Can't figure out how to pronounce "Daesh"? Just call them Douche.

    Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) at 2015-11-17T15:15:32Z, sazius at, Elena ``of Valhalla'' likes this.

  • The British Driving Rule

    Elena ``of Valhalla'' at 2015-11-15T11:10:03Z

    The British Driving Rule
    The left side of the road is the right side of the road, and the right side of the road is the wrong side of the road.

    Susan Pinochet, Kyosuke likes this.

    By the transitive property, the left side of the road is the wrong side of the road. 

    Susan Pinochet at 2015-11-16T15:22:55Z

  • GPL Enforcement and the Trans-Pacific Partnership

    Software Freedom Conservancy at 2015-11-10T18:35:46Z


    A Blog post by Bradley M. Kuhn and Karen M. Sandler

    GPL Enforcement and the Trans-Pacific Partnership

    Many people have criticized the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) treaty since the text was released. In particular, some of the terms in the agreement are bad for software freedom and other social justice causes. Despite the TPP's stated intention to bring "social benefits" in addition to economic growth, the terms of TPP work against social benefits and awards too much power and control to large multinational corporations, including proprietary software companies.

    The agreement text is lengthy and complex, filed with bad provisions. A few days ago, the Free Software community uncovered the following text from the TPP:

    1. No Party shall require the transfer of, or access to, source code of software owned by a person of another Party, as a condition for the import, distribution, sale or use of such software, or of products containing such software, in its territory.

    2. For the purposes of this Article, software subject to paragraph 1 is limited to mass-market software or products containing such software and does not include software used for critical infrastructure.

    3. Nothing in this Article shall preclude:

    (a) the inclusion or implementation of terms and conditions related to the provision of source code in commercially negotiated contracts; or

    (b) a Party from requiring the modification of source code of software necessary for that software to comply with laws or regulations which are not inconsistent with this Agreement.

    4. This Article shall not be construed to affect requirements that relate to patent applications or granted patents, including any orders made by a judicial authority in relation to patent disputes, subject to safeguards against unauthorised disclosure under the law or practice of a Party.

    The revelation of this clause has confused our community, as it appears as if this provision, once adopted, might impact or restrict the international operation of copyleft licenses. Below we explain that, while everyone should reject and oppose this provision — and the rest of TPP — this provision has no dramatic impact on copyleft licensing.

    First, as others have pointed out, Party is a defined term that refers specifically to government entities that sign the treaty. As such, the provision would only constrain the behavior of governments themselves. There are some obviously bad outcomes of this provision when those governmental entities interfere with public safety and ethical distribution of software, but we believe this provision will not interfere with international enforcement of copyleft.

    Copyleft licenses use copyright as a mechanism to keep software free. The central GPL mechanism that copyright holders exercise to ensure software freedom is termination of permission to copy, modify and distribute the software (per GPLv2§4 and GPLv3§8). Under GPL's termination provisions, non-compliance results in an automatic termination of all copyright permissions. In practice, distributors can chose — either they can provide the source code or cease distribution. Once permissions terminate, any distribution of the GPL'd software infringes copyrights. Accordingly, in an enforcement action, there is no need to specifically compel a government to ask for disclosure of source code.

    For example, imagine if a non-US entity ships a GPL-violating, Linux-based product into the USA, and after many friendly attempts to achieve compliance, the violating company refuses to comply. Conservancy can sue the company in US federal court, and seek injunction for distribution of the foreign product in the USA, since the product infringes copyright by violating the license. The detailed reasons for that infringement (i.e., failure to disclose source code) is somewhat irrelevant to the central issue; the Court can grant injunction (i.e., an order to prevent the company from distributing the infringing product) based simply on the violator's lost permissions under the existing copyright license. The Court could even order the cease of import of the infringing products.

    In our view, the violator would be unaffected under the above TPP provision, since the Court did not specifically compel release of the source code, but rather simply ruled that the product generally infringed copyrights, and their distribution rights had fully terminated upon infringement. In other words, the fact that the violator lost copyright permissions and can seek to restore them via source code disclosure is not dispositive to the underlying infringement claim.

    While TPP thus does not impact copyright holders' ability to enforce the GPL, there are nevertheless plenty of reasons to oppose TPP. Conservancy therefore joins the FSF, EFF, and other organizations in encouraging everyone to oppose TPP.

    Help support Conservancy and its efforts to defend the GPL by becoming a Supporter today.

    Posted by Bradley M. Kuhn and Karen M. Sandler on November 9, 2015. Please email any comments on this entry to

    Susan Pinochet, Sajith Sasidharan, João Patrício, Jure Repinc (JLP) and 5 others likes this.

    Luis Ángel Fernández Fernández, João Patrício, Jure Repinc (JLP), AJ Jordan and 8 others shared this.

  • David Thompson at 2015-11-11T19:36:34Z

    "We view “reproducible builds” as a technical means to an end: that of guaranteeing user autonomy and safety."

    Elena ``of Valhalla'', guile, Susan Pinochet, Olivier Mehani and 6 others likes this.

    Olivier Mehani, Christopher Allan Webber shared this.

  • Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) at 2015-11-13T11:24:27Z

    gregkh gets it:

    Where do you think that "new developers" come from? Do they show up in our inbox, with full knowledge of kernel internals and OS theory yet they somehow just can't grasp how to submit a patch correctly? Yes, they sometimes rarely do. But for the majority of people who got into Linux, that is not the case at all.

    /via Developer recruitment and outreach, linked from that KS collection.

    Drew Fustini, Susan Pinochet likes this.

  • Exercising Software Freedom in the Global Email System

    Bradley M. Kuhn at 2015-09-15T23:45:05Z

    [ This post was cross-posted on Conservancy's blog. ]

    In this post, I discuss one example of how a choice for software freedom can cause many strange problems that others will dismiss. My goal here is to explain in gory detail how proprietary software biases in the computing world continue to grow, notwithstanding Open Source ballyhoo.

    Two decades ago, nearly every company, organization, entity, and tech-minded individual ran their own email server. Generally speaking, even back then, nearly all the software for both MTAs and MUAs were Free Software0. MTA's are the mail transport agents — the complex software that moves email around from one Internet domain to another. MUAs are the mail user agents, sometimes called mail clients — the local programs with which users manipulate their own email.

    I've run my own MTA since around 1993: initially with sendmail, then with exim for a while, and with Postfix since 1999 or so. Also, everywhere I've worked throughout my entire career since 1995, I've either been in charge of — or been the manager of the person in charge of — the MTA installation for the organization where I worked. In all cases, that MTA has always been Free Software, of course.

    However, the world of email has changed drastically during that period. The most notable change in the email world is the influx of massive amounts of spam, which has been used as an excuse to implement another disturbing change. Slowly but surely, email service — both the MTA and the MUA — have been outsourced for most organizations. Specifically, either (a) organizations run proprietary software on their own computers to deal with email and/or (b) people pay a third-party to run proprietary and/or trade-secret software on their behalf to handle the email services. Email, generally speaking, isn't handled by Free Software all that much anymore.

    This situation became acutely apparent to me this earlier this month when Conservancy moved its email server. I had plenty of warning that the move was needed1, and I'd set up a test site on the new server. We sent and received some of our email for months (mostly mailing list traffic) using that server configured with a different domain ( When the shut-off day came, I moved's email officially. All looked good: I had a current Debian, with a new version of Postfix and Dovecot on a speedier host, and with better spam protection settings in Postfix and better spam filtering with a newer version of SpamAssassin. All was going great, thanks to all those great Free Software projects — until the proprietary software vendors threw a spanner in our works.

    For reasons that we'll never determine for sure2, the IPv4 number that our new hosting provide gave us was already listed on many spam blacklists. I won't debate the validity of various blacklists here, but the fact is, for nearly every public-facing, pure-blacklist-only service, delisting is straightforward, takes about 24 hours, and requires at most answering some basic questions about your domain name and answering a captcha-like challenge. These services, even though some are quite dubious, are not the center of my complaint.

    The real peril comes from third-party email hosting companies. These companies have arbitrary, non-public blacklisting rules. More importantly, they are not merely blacklist maintainers, they are MTA (and in some cases, even MUA) providers who sell their proprietary and/or trade-secret hosted solutions as a package to customers. Years ago, the idea of giving up that much control of what happens to your own email would be considered unbelievable. Today, it's commonplace.

    And herein lies the fact that is obvious to most software freedom advocates but indiscernible by most email users. As a Free Software user, with your own MTA on your own machine, your software only functions if everyone else respects your right to run that software yourself. Furthermore, if the people you want to email are fully removed from their hosting service, they won't realize nor understand that their hosting site might block your emails. These companies have their customers fully manipulated to oppose your software freedom. In other words, you can't appeal to those customers (the people you want to email), because you're likely the only person to ever raise this issue with them (i.e., unless they know you very well, they'll assume you're crazy). You're left begging to the provider, whom you have no business relationship with, to convince them that their customers want to hear from you. Your voice rings out indecipherable from the spammers who want the same permission to attack their customers.

    The upshot for Conservancy? For days, Microsoft told all its customers that Conservancy is a spammer; Microsoft did it so subtly that the customers wouldn't even believe it if we told them. Specifically, every time I or one of my Conservancy colleagues emailed organizations using Microsoft's “Exchange Online”, “Office 365” or similar products to host email for their domain4, we got the following response:

                Sep  2 23:26:26 pine postfix/smtp[31888]: 27CD6E12B: to=,[]:25, delay=5.6, delays=0.43/0/0.16/5, dsn=5.7.1, status=bounced (host[] said: 550 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [] blocked using FBLW15; To request removal from this list please forward this message to (in reply to RCPT TO command))

    Oh, you ask, did you forward your message to the specified address? Of course I did; right away! I got back an email that said:

    Hello ,

    Thank you for your delisting request SRXNUMBERSID. Your ticket was received on (Sep 01 2015 06:13 PM UTC) and will be responded to within 24 hours.

    Once we passed the 24 hour mark with no response, I started looking around for more information. I also saw a suggestion online that calling is the only way to escalate one of those tickets, so I phoned 800-865-9408 and gave V-2JECOD my ticket number and she told that I could only raise these issues with the “Mail Flow Team”. She put me on hold for them, and told me that I was number 2 in the queue for them so it should be a few minutes. I waited on hold for just under six hours. I finally reached a helpful representative, who said the ticket was the lowest level of escalation available (he hinted that it would take weeks to resolve at that level, which is consistent with other comments about this problem I've seen online). The fellow on the phone agreed to escalate it to the highest priority available, and said within four hours, Conservancy should be delisted. Thus, ultimately, I did resolve these issues after about 72 hours. But, I'd spent about 15 hours all-told researching various blacklists, email hosting companies, and their procedures3, and that was after I'd already carefully configured our MTA and DNS to be very RFC-compliant (which is complicated and confusing, but absolutely essential to stay off these blacklists once you're off).

    Admittedly, this sounds like a standard Kafkaesque experience with a large company that almost everyone in post-modern society has experienced. However, it's different in one key way: I had to convince Microsoft to allow me to communicate with their customers who are paying Microsoft for proprietary and/or trade-secret software and services, ostensibly to improve efficiency of their communications. Plus, since Microsoft, by the nature of their so-called spam blocking, doesn't inform their customers who they've blocked, I and my colleagues would have just sounded crazy if we'd asked our contacts to call their provider instead. (I actually considered this, and realized that we might negatively impact relationships with professional contacts.)

    These problems do reduce email software freedom by network effects. Most people rely on third-party proprietary email software from Google, Microsoft, Barracuda, or others. Therefore, most people, don't exercise any software freedom regarding email services. Since exercising software freedom for email slowly becomes a rarer and rarer (rather than norm it once was), society slowly but surely pegs those who do exercise software freedom as “random crazy people”.

    There are a few companies who are seeking to do email hosting in a way that respects your software freedom. The real test of such companies is if someone technically minded can get the same software configured on their own systems, and have it work the same way. Yet, in most cases, you go to one of these company's Github pages and find a bunch of stuff pushed public, but limited information on how to configure it so that it functions the same way the hosted service does. RMS wrote years ago that Free Software cannot properly succeed without Free Documentation, and in many of these hosting cases: the hosting company is using fully upstreamed Free Software, but has configured the software in a way that is difficult to stumble upon by oneself. (For that reason, I'm committing to writing up tutorials on how Conservancy configured our mail server, so at least I'll be part of the solution instead of part of the problem.)

    BTW, as I dealt with all this, I couldn't help but think of John Gilmore's activism efforts regarding open mail relays. While I don't agree with all of John's positions on this, his fundamental position is right: we must oppose companies who think they know better how we should configure our email servers (or on which IP numbers we should run those servers). I'd add a corollary that there's a serious threat to software freedom, at least with regard to email software, if we continue to allow such top-down control of the once beautifully decentralized email system.

    The future of software freedom depends on issues like this. Imagine someone who has just learned that they can run their own email server, or bought some Free Software-based plug computing system that purports to be a “home cloud” service with email. There's virtually no chance that such users would bother to figure all this out. They'd see their email blocked, declare the “home cloud” solution useless, and would just get a,, or some other third-party email account. Thus, I predict that software freedom that we once had, for our MTAs and MUAs, will eventually evaporate for everyone except those tiny few who invest the time to understand these complexities and fight the for-profit corporate power that curtails software freedom. Furthermore, that struggle becomes Sisyphean as our numbers dwindle.

    Email is the oldest software-centric communication system on the planet. The global email system serves as a canary in the coalmine regarding software freedom and network service freedom issues. Frighteningly, software now controls most of the global communications systems. How long will it be before mobile network providers refuse to terminate PSTN calls or SMS's sent from devices running modified Android firmwares like Replicant? Perhaps those providers, like large email providers, will argue that preventing robocalls (the telephone equivalent of SPAM) necessitates such blocking. Such network effects create place so many dystopias on software freedom's horizon.

    I don't deny that every day, there is more Free Software existing in the world than has ever existed before — the P.T. Barnum's of Open Source have that part right. The part they leave out is that, each day, their corporate backers make it a little more difficult to complete mundane tasks using only Free Software. Open Source wins the battle while software freedom loses the war.

    0Yes, I'm intimately aware that Elm's license was non-free, and that the software freedom of PINE's license was in question. That's slightly relevant here but mostly orthogonal to this point, because Free Software MUAs were still very common then, and there were (ultimately successful) projects to actively rewrite the ones whose software freedom was in question

    1For the last five years, one of Conservancy's Director Emeriti, Loïc Dachary, has donated an extensive personal amount of personal time and in-kind donations by providing Cloud server for Conservancy to host its three key servers, including the email server. The burden of maintaining this for us became too time consuming (very reasonably), and Loïc's asked us to find another provider. I want, BTW, to thank Loïc his for years of volunteer work maintaining infrastructure for us; he provided this service for much longer than we could have hoped! Loïc also gave us plenty of warning that we'd need to move. None of these problems are his fault in the least!

    2The obvious supposition is that, because IPv4 numbers are so scarce, this particular IP number was likely used previously by a spammer who was shut down.

    3I of course didn't count the time time on phone hold, as I was able to do other work while waiting, but less efficiently because the hold music was very distracting.

    4If you want to see if someone's domain is a Microsoft customer, see if the MX record for their domain (say, points to

    Stéphane Guillou, Splicer, David "Judah's Shadow" Blue, Ramakrishnan and 7 others likes this.

    Free Software Foundation, marxistvegan, marxistvegan, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) and 6 others shared this.

    Show all 6 replies
    Clicking "like" seems inappropriate but as someone that's run their own mail server out of their home since 1999, I can attest to these problems. I have no plans to stop though.

    Jason Self at 2015-09-16T02:38:43Z

    AJ Jordan, X11R5 likes this.

    @Stephen Michael Kellat The problems of deploying both email and mediagoblin were probably the two strongest motivators for me to start thinking along userops lines :)

    Christopher Allan Webber at 2015-09-16T15:39:27Z

    olm-e, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) likes this.

    @Stephen Michael Kellat I do think the situation isn't going to get better until we make running servers easier.

    Christopher Allan Webber at 2015-09-16T15:40:30Z

    Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) likes this.

    the problem from a free software standpoint, is that even if we get self hosting to be much easier, there black listing problem becomes worse since spammers will be able to take advantage as well....

    David "Judah's Shadow" Blue at 2015-09-17T14:11:47Z

  • joeyh interview

    Debian Project at 2015-03-01T04:13:28Z

    joeyh interviewed about his life after Debian, bye :'(

    Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠), Jakukyo Friel, Susan Pinochet, Lars Wirzenius and 5 others likes this.

    Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠), Lars Wirzenius shared this.

    "I want to build worthwhile things that might last."

    +12765 to that.

    Lars Wirzenius at 2015-03-02T18:19:35Z

    Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) likes this.

  • at 2015-01-27T12:29:04Z

    Somebody help calm it down.

    Susan Pinochet, Douglas Perkins, ben, Efraim Flashner likes this.

    In the office, on a glass door is a sign that reads, "Keep Clear" ...

    ben at 2015-01-27T13:15:58Z

    Susan Pinochet likes this.

  • ben at 2015-01-27T13:15:58Z

    In the office, on a glass door is a sign that reads, "Keep Clear" ...

    Susan Pinochet likes this.

  • consumer electronics

    joeyh at 2015-01-27T16:47:19Z

    10 tiny torx screws and masking tape. That's what I hate about taking a laptop apart. The fan yesterday developed a slight burr, almost unnoticable until you do and then annoying without end.

    Had to work on it for 2 solid hours. My smallest torx bit didn't quite fit; lived in fear of stripping the screws. Rehearsed everything on my same-model parts laptop, and still hated every minute of it. Eventually I disconnected the fan, for now. Its cable was held down by a spot of masking tape. That's new; they must have changed cable lengths and this was some engineer's quick fix.

    And that's what I hate about taking a laptop apart, I see the shortcuts, the screws that bite into plastic, the ribbon cables with their latches surely rated for < 100 cycles, the bits of tape. Once I've had a laptop apart I can never look at it quite the same way again, as a hunk of consumer electronics that is going to work for a while, until entropy eats it and it doesn't. I know , and somehow, when it comes to consumer hardware, I don't want to.

    Software is so different for me, I had no problem PEEKing and POKEing away at the fan controller's bits last night, although I have not managed to adapt to work with this model so far, and only managed to get the fan stuck on high, rather than turned off.

    I want a bunnie laptop. If it's designed to be taken apart, it wouldn't bother me.

    Susan Pinochet, Tyng-Ruey Chuang, Olivier Mehani, and 1 others likes this.

    Laptop temp seems to be holding steady at 48C, with spike to 51C during a long compile. Seems pretty reasonable w/o a fan, at least in January. I think the fan used to keep it around 42C.

    joeyh at 2015-01-27T22:02:05Z

  • long comment tail

    joeyh at 2015-01-28T16:48:49Z

    I've had several recent blog posts on the front page of Hacker news. Generally the Sunday after I write them.

    Often they get 30k page views and not a single comment (on the blog or HN), which is understandable since my blog has been somewhat esoteric lately. (My poor mum, trying to make sense of monads)

    But then there's comments on 8 year old blog posts. Like

    This is something that worries me about the pump network BTW, discoverability for old posts is not very good. Most posts don't seem to be getting into the Internet Archive; it visits my page only a few times a year, and Evan's only a little more often. I'll bet that google doesn't much notice when pump posts are shared and popular unless a traditional website links to them, either. This is likely not good for both long tail effects and network growth effects.

    Jakukyo Friel, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠), Susan Pinochet, and 3 others likes this.

    Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) shared this.

    Yeah, spider discoverability of public posts is really important for our digital heritage.

    Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) at 2015-01-30T14:49:32Z

  • winter in the South

    joeyh at 2015-01-21T19:32:05Z

    On the porch swing in the sun, in bare feet and a t-shirt. Almost like it's not January. In 2 days, it might well be snowing.

    Susan Pinochet, Greg Grossmeier, cmhobbs likes this.

  • Christopher Allan Webber at 2015-01-22T17:05:14Z

    The most clear sign of insanity available is that you're using M-x ansi-term in emacs because you're too lazy to open a real terminal. Looks like I'm insane, then.

    Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠), Douglas Perkins,, Susan Pinochet likes this.

    Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠), Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠), X11R5 shared this.

    I need to give ansi-term another shot.  Someone told me to configure ansi-term to open screen instead of bash for a better experience.

    David Thompson at 2015-01-22T17:29:48Z

    multi-term or bust!

    cmhobbs at 2015-01-29T05:01:46Z

  • Location Sharing

    XKCD at 2015-01-14T13:45:03Z

    Location Sharing
    Our phones must have great angular momentum sensors because the compasses really suck.

    Vladimir, Susan Pinochet,, sazius likes this.

    Vladimir, sazius shared this.

    Oh goodness. People are arguing about this in the office...

    Charles Stanhope at 2015-01-14T17:28:21Z

    LOL, what is there to argue about? It's a funny joke :-)

    sazius at 2015-01-14T17:34:46Z

    I certainly laughed, but somebody here was saying "I don't get the joke" because the character is obviously not a subatomic particle. Tastes for humor can be very personal. :)

    Charles Stanhope at 2015-01-14T17:47:41Z

    Yeah, jokes should never be taken too seriously :-)

    sazius at 2015-01-14T17:49:05Z

  • Christopher Allan Webber at 2014-12-03T15:36:19Z

    Are there many words worse than "webinar"?

    Susan Pinochet, Stephen Michael Kellat,, cmhobbs and 1 others likes this.

    Stephen Michael Kellat, Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) shared this.

    Good for them in many of the us than you should. But is how well @eloquence is portrayed, imo. :) I'm musing about adding words to the lobby, just to feel like computers are magic again (have i said on monday.

    X11R5 at 2014-12-03T16:04:48Z in Hawthorne, Nevada

  • Bradley M. Kuhn at 2014-11-04T22:51:22Z

    I'm seriously considering running for the state legislature wherever I move to next.

    uıɐɾ ʞ ʇɐɯɐs, Susan Pinochet, Mike Linksvayer, Evan Prodromou and 3 others likes this.

    Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠) shared this.