Fucking spammers.

Doctoral thesis successfully defended, also survived the doctoral dinner/party, the after party and the after-after party. Sleep needed :-)

It's still a centralized silo, where everyone is in the hands of just one company.

No deal. Jabber/XMPP FTW! =)

I don’t care whether it’s ello or sgrouples or FriendFace or app.net or whatever, I am not joining another walled-in social network owned by a single organization. I already have enough of those.

I don’t care if it has a strong privacy policy, I don’t care if it has good security, I don’t care if it has no advertising, I don’t care if it will let you remain pseudonymous, I don’t care if the people who own it are really cool. All of those things are worthless if the site is controlled by a single organization, because they can all be changed on a whim.

Remember, Facebook used to be ad-free, somewhat closed, had no data mining, and didn’t force you to sign up with your real name. Then they decided they had to make money, and their only resource was a captive user base.

Twitter used to be ad-free with no data mining, and it used to be open so anyone could write clients for it. Then they decided they had to make money, and that meant making sure clients showed ads properly, and that meant locking out your favorite Twitter client and showing you posts that nobody had retweeted.

Go back even further into the past, and LiveJournal used to be run by a small team of people who were directly engaged with their user base. Then they sold out to a company who didn’t care, who sold out to a Russian company who were in it for the money.

Make no mistake, this cycle will repeat itself with ello and all the other closed-off single-provider social networks. Servers cost significant time and money to run — I know because I run some. Unless you have an eccentric millionaire or a trust fund to pay for the hosting, as the site grows, sooner or later someone’s going to decide that it needs to pay for itself. In fact, even if you have funding from an eccentric millionaire, you’re still reliant on their whims to keep the privacy and advertising policies you like.

Read more: http://meta.ath0.com/2014/09/25/interested-joining-proprietary-social-network/

This is an oft-occuring scenario for me:

• see a link to a photo on instagram
• "OK, let's click this, maybe I'll learn what's fuss about instagram at the same time"
• click link
• see an entirely white blank web page
• "oh, I have to enable scripting to see anything"
• get angry at today's web design
• close page

Good morning & tzag pumpiverse, and happy birthday, Debian!

Check out Roll Your Own YouTube/Flickr with MediaGoblin in LinuxJournal. Awesome!

Yo know when iw my birthday ;-)

1. A serialization for social data. This will likely be Activity Streams 2.0 or some future version.
2. A client-to-server API. This will be likely be based on the Open Social Embedded Experiences API - a simple, RESTful Activity-Streams-based API.
3. A server-to-server protocol for sharing data between social networks.

OK, everybody stand back! Installing a new 2TB drive in my desktop computer and installing a fresh Debian "wheezy" on it! :-)

XMPP, mail, contacts, calendar, music-streaming, pump.io, mediagoblin, probably some more I just forgot and since recently: a jitsi videobridge.

Preferably on completely free hardware that runns FreedomBox.

dreaming

Whew! And now I can finally get on to more exciting, non-fundraising things!

Now you're making me want to donate a third time :-)

Turkey bans YouTube, Twitter after leaks

Yep, still feel like I'm working on the right projects.